Someone who actually knows what they’re talking about says:
Sorry Richard, but while I don’t agree with Tim Worstall on much stuff – particularly his hatred of the European project, and greater backing of tax evasion than I would support – I have never, ever, ever read an argument of yours that managed [...]
Entries Tagged as 'Ragging on Ritchie'
Well now, that’s my ego polished good n’proper
March 19th, 2010 · 6 Comments
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie’s High Horse!
March 16th, 2010 · 2 Comments
E&Y and Lehman show that he’s been right all along of course. Thus accounting and auditing should be changed to suit his interests.
Slightly sad that he sets off with this:
…and it was used thereafter without further question arising to deliberately misrepresent the true nature of the balance sheet of the entity.
That sounds shocking [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie, Ritchie….
March 16th, 2010 · 12 Comments
The UK has £28 billion of unpaid tax debt. I estimate tax avoidance (legal but unacceptable abuse of tax law) to run at £25 billion a year and tax evasion (fraudulent law-breaking) at £70 billion. Tackling these issues could close the fiscal deficit.
The joy of this is that he doesn’t even realise [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
On the incidence of corporation tax
March 16th, 2010 · 4 Comments
One for Ritchie and points left.
A central tenet of public finance, however, is that the entity that has the legal obligation to pay a tax is not necessarily the one that bears the burden. For example, payroll taxes are levied on firms, but we know that they are mostly borne by workers. [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
This is disgusting, should be a special tax on it!
March 12th, 2010 · 7 Comments
Will you look at this eh?
Across the partnership, sales increase by 7.5 per cent… to take pre-tax profit to £155m. This was down on last year’s £282m,
So, item one, a fall in profits.
staff will share £151m as a bonus
Bonuses amount to an eyewatering 97.5% of profits. That’s item two. Item two [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie’s got a new report out
March 11th, 2010 · 2 Comments
And it’s a corker.
Three major points.
1) It’s written for the main union representing HMRC staff. And it says that there should be more HMRC staff. Funny that, quite amazing how he gets to that position really. If we didn’t know that Ritchie is entirely incapable of such behaviour we might begin to wonder whether he’s [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchieism of the day
March 11th, 2010 · 8 Comments
It’s time professional people changed their tune: their duty is to support tax systems – not undermine them.
Rilly?
Just to take an extreme example: the duty of a barrister when defending someone accused of tax offences is to go all Soviet on them? Yes, yes, you’re right, my client is a horrible person who should be locked [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie discovers another piece of the economics puzzle
March 9th, 2010 · 3 Comments
I don’t find this surprising at all. If people maximise it is their overall well-being that they seek to enhance.
If he’d actually paid attention to his economics courses at Southampton all those years ago he would have known this.
People maximise utility, not income, leisure, work, sleep, sex or any other one thing.
All of that blackboard [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Domicile matters
March 7th, 2010 · 6 Comments
Contrary to those who claim that domicile is some strange beast grafted onto the UK tax system,. it’s actually quite an important part of the Common Law:
But at the heart of last week’s hearing is the issue of where the Turkish Cypriot tycoon was domiciled when he died.
Erkin and his family insist that Ramadan Guney’s [...]
Tags: Law · Ragging on Ritchie
Tax incidence
March 6th, 2010 · 2 Comments
Bad news for those saying that it’ll just be the banks paying any further taxes on the banking system:
In a report on the White House’s plan to impose a 0.15pc fee on liabilities of banks with more than $50bn in assets in order to recoup [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie, academia and corporate taxes.
March 3rd, 2010 · 3 Comments
If anyone’s at a loose end tonight would they fancy going along to the House of Commons? There’s an interesting question that should be asked.
R. Murphy Esq will be speaking:
I am speaking at a meeting tonight in the House of Commons organised by the University and Colleges Union.
The aim is to abolish university fees [...]
Tags: Education · Ragging on Ritchie
Dear Mr Murphy
March 2nd, 2010 · 7 Comments
Julian Cook, an economist at Madeley-Finnegan, said: “Lord Ashcroft is one of around 60 million people in Britain who want to pay less tax.
“He does this by hiring an accountant who reduces his tax bill by as much as is legally possible, sends him an invoice and then everyone goes about [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
More discussion with Ritchie
February 26th, 2010 · 6 Comments
“Which brings me to your long point on FTTs: tell me what the real cost of a 10bp margin is and who will really lose.”
OK. Taking the numbers you’ve given me here.
Before the tax we have a 2 bps margin. We add the 0.5 bps tax. We then have a 10 bps margin. Those are [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
More on Ritchie’s sources
February 26th, 2010 · No Comments
Although relatively few in number, large international banks dominate the global FX
market. The ‘economic footprint’ of the CTDL would, in the first instance, fall upon
these large financial institutions that are members of the CLS Bank and the Real Time
Gross Settlement systems (RTGS). There is little doubt that they could comfortably
absorb the levy given the size [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie’s ideas on the FX market.
February 26th, 2010 · 2 Comments
At the heart of R. Murphy’s ideas about the financial transactions tax is the thought that the tax will widen margins in the FX business (well, actually all markets). Wider margins will lead to lower liquidity and thus lower profits for banks and thus lower pay for bankers.
This is one of the source documents he [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie’s comments are open again
February 26th, 2010 · 1 Comment
So, I’m trying to, politely, get him to see my point:
“I’m well aware conventional economists do not agree – and they have provided not a shred of evidence, let alone logic, to support their case as yet. They simply say the cost will be passed on to others – but when the [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie changes his mind!
February 22nd, 2010 · 5 Comments
There’s been something nagging me about R. Murphy’s latest little essay for the TUC. It doesn’t seem to mention his last little essay for the TUC.
Back in November he said that there should be a 0.05% tax on all interbank and CHAPS transfers.
I was among those who started shouting that he’s just closed down the [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Ritchie gets worse
February 20th, 2010 · 7 Comments
The major cost of trading in this market, which is largely undertaken between a very limited range of banks –
often, as noted on a pure inter-bank basis – or with a limited range of large commercial counterparties
operating what are, in effect, their own in house banks usually called treasury departments, is labour. Those
employed in this [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
Yet even more on Ritchie’s report on taxing the banks.
February 20th, 2010 · No Comments
As the report notes, the short term alternative of an insurance charge that some promote as an alternative to
financial transaction taxes does not have any of the benefits flowing from adoption of these taxes as noted
above, nor can it raise equivalent revenues. In addition, whilst financial transaction taxes should only eliminate
marginal trades but leave markets [...]
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie
A perfect comment on Ritchie’s taxation proposals
February 19th, 2010 · No Comments
One might be tempted to say, it can’t get worse than the status quo, but that what the Russians said in 1917, and boy were they wrong.
Eric Falkenstein.
Tags: Ragging on Ritchie