And then when the US finally started pulling its weight on the climate crisis, it did so in a way that amounted to indirect siphoning from Europe’s economy instead of just paying the true costs of its own polluting. Never mind that Europeans have, for decades, emitted far less per capita than Americans, who, despite having substantially higher median disposable incomes than, say, the French, pay roughly half as much for petrol – and only $0.184 a gallon of that in tax, an amount that hasn’t budged since 1993. (Somehow they manage to remain insufferable whiners about how much it costs to fill the tanks of the increasingly enormous cars they choose to drive.)
There’s that overarching argument – the US is stealing from the EU economy by doing something about climate change – but there’s also that telling detail. That gas tax mentioned in the Federal one. And it’s only the Federal one. Near all states also have a state gasoline tax. There are also more local taxes in some areas.
The mimbling whinge is complaining as if an American said there’s no EU petrol tax therefore there’s no tax on petrol in the EU. Which would be, we agree, grossly stupid, yes?
Of course, the argument gets very much worse. Apparently Hungary is not meeting the standards the writer expects in falling into the EU line. Therefore:
The EU finally has a window to act against the concrete threat Orbán poses to the rule of law, democracy and the union’s own ability to function. Now it must use it. Article 7 of the treaty on European union allows for a member state’s membership rights to be suspended if it “seriously and persistently breaches the principles on which the EU is founded”, defined as “respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities”.
The voters of Hungary are to be entirely disenfranchised. We must, at the same time, have more democracy!
There is a collection of urgent actions the EU could move forward with to make itself more democratic, nimble and effective. These include setting a common floor for corporate tax rates and collecting up to that amount as EU “own resources” to replace national contributions; far more ambitious green infrastructure and climate spending with a pan-European vision, rather than a collection of national ones; perhaps even setting up a single, directly elected European “president” rather than the competing dual presidencies of the commission and the council.
Yes, well done, entirely disempower the demos and that makes us more democratic, right?
Alexander Hurst is a France-based writer and an adjunct lecturer at Sciences Po, the Paris Institute of Political Studies
Jeez. Can’t even get a real job at a sodding *French* university….