Tim Worstall

It is all obvious or trivial except…

 

 

Well, yes, I would describe politicians in this manner

February 24th, 2013 · 8 Comments

At fiery rallies, shedelivers similar nationalist rhetoric in front of images of Evita. But according to a former Kirchner insider, she now also suffers the same delusions of grandeur and power.

“She is a paranoid, arrogant person which in turn hides a deep insecurity,” he said. “She’s also a very mistrustful person who surrounds herself with a small cadre of yes men and yes women.” “The Casa Rosada operates like a court. She’s the queen surrounded by courtesans who only want to deliver good news.”


I have a
feeling that the correct translation there is courtiers, not courtesans. But expensive whores describes politicians well enough.

Share

Tags: Politics

8 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Falco // Feb 24, 2013 at 10:46 am

    Weird webby thing – Chrome keeps refusing to update the front page any further than “Oh Dear” 20th Feb. Fine in Firefox.

  • 2 Luke // Feb 24, 2013 at 11:02 am

    I’m surprised you’ve not taken the opportunity to comment on the relative value for money of courtesans and politicians. Talk about missing am open goal.

  • 3 The Sage // Feb 24, 2013 at 11:07 am

    Actually, courtesan was originally the female form of courtier, just that the usage there moved to reflect the reality.

  • 4 MattyJ // Feb 24, 2013 at 12:23 pm

    @Falco: clear out the cookies for this site in Chrome.

  • 5 Rob // Feb 24, 2013 at 1:51 pm

    Argentina is cursed to perform the same pantomime over and over again.

    Is the country cursed with generation after generation of corrupt and useless politicians or does a culture get the goverment it deserves? Almost certainly the latter.

  • 6 Surreptitious Evil // Feb 24, 2013 at 4:56 pm

    or does a culture get the goverment it deserves? Almost certainly the latter.

    But the latin cultures just get more expressively useless pols than the anglo ones – the character may vary but the competence (okay, actually, lack thereof) does not.

    Kirchner versus Harman (or Smith, Abbot, Winterton, Ashton etc, etc, etc)- if that was your choice? The expansively insane ego-maniac or the lucretian plotter. Given that useless has to be accepted? At least we all know where nu-Evita is coming from.

  • 7 Edward Lud // Feb 25, 2013 at 1:52 pm

    SE, I applaud the colour of your descriptions. Only trouble is, I can’t tell which are supposed to apply to Kirchner and which to Harman et al!

  • 8 Monday Night Quick Hits: Well, yes, I would describe politicians in this manner | motorcitytimes.com // Feb 26, 2013 at 1:56 am

    [...] Via Timmy: [...]

Leave a Comment