He really is a toad and deserves both of these.
Query: if the CPA benefits when non-CPAers invest in the CPA, why do you think that America suffers when non-Americans invest in America? That is, can you explain why the productivity of you and your colleagues at the CPA will rise if I make a net investment in the CPA while the productivity of you, me, and other American workers will fall if someone from Toronto or Tokyo or Timbuktu makes a net investment in America?
There is one good thing we can say about it. If Fletcher has to run an email round robin to try and raise $50k then there’s a lot fewer fools funding him than I had thought there were. I had thought that his lot were the type to spend that on the mineral water bill.
5 responses so far ↓
1 dearieme // Dec 21, 2012 at 11:26 am
You coulda helped us by a preliminary remark explaining “CPA”. Criminal Practitioners of America? Chartered Pillocks Association? Caribbean and Pacific Agency?
2 MellorSJ // Dec 21, 2012 at 12:16 pm
Communist Protectionist Assholes?
3 MellorMJ // Dec 21, 2012 at 3:43 pm
Consumerised Pink Avocados
4 Matthew L // Dec 22, 2012 at 7:09 am
To be fair, dearieme, expanding the acronym doesn’t actually help. It’s one of those meaningless feelgood terms. Coalition of Protectionist Arseholes is a much more useful name.
5 MellorSJ // Dec 22, 2012 at 9:43 am
And descriptive.
Leave a Comment