<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And now let us praise Gordon Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Simpleton</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-45225</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Simpleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=15162#comment-45225</guid>
		<description>The rules for Oftel (now Ofcom) were changed after the auction to stop them making revenue the sole aim of licensing spectrum. Maybe India should consider why.

Furthermore, there may have been an argument for technology specific licenses for 2G, and in the early days of 3G, to drive economies of scale. But now that 4G technologies are available and soft radio technology means that mobiles can be easily configured for different technologies,  India (and Ofcom with the 3G extension spectrum) should be encouraging innovation by selling technology neutral licenses.

@Gareth, what caused the problem was the cost meant that the mobile operators came under pressure to go with an immature technology. Hutchison Whampoa put so much pressure on 3 that they had at least three launches and the technology became a bit of a joke. It did increase the workforce as 3 sucked a huge amount of radio engineers and roll out specialists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules for Oftel (now Ofcom) were changed after the auction to stop them making revenue the sole aim of licensing spectrum. Maybe India should consider why.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there may have been an argument for technology specific licenses for 2G, and in the early days of 3G, to drive economies of scale. But now that 4G technologies are available and soft radio technology means that mobiles can be easily configured for different technologies,  India (and Ofcom with the 3G extension spectrum) should be encouraging innovation by selling technology neutral licenses.</p>
<p>@Gareth, what caused the problem was the cost meant that the mobile operators came under pressure to go with an immature technology. Hutchison Whampoa put so much pressure on 3 that they had at least three launches and the technology became a bit of a joke. It did increase the workforce as 3 sucked a huge amount of radio engineers and roll out specialists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-45217</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=15162#comment-45217</guid>
		<description>The spectrum auctions caused a loss of momentum and jobs in the European telecoms industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spectrum auctions caused a loss of momentum and jobs in the European telecoms industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diogenes</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-45201</link>
		<dc:creator>diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=15162#comment-45201</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s not going to make any difference to hte price that companies charge anyway: they’ll still charge the maximum the market will bear. The auction of the spectrum creates tax revenues and thus other tax rates can be lower for whatever level of services is provided.&quot;

That is correct...but it will still retard investment - why else is 3G take-up so low still in the UK after all these years...The auction basically taxed the operators to the point of collapse...the strange thing is why did those companies do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s not going to make any difference to hte price that companies charge anyway: they’ll still charge the maximum the market will bear. The auction of the spectrum creates tax revenues and thus other tax rates can be lower for whatever level of services is provided.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is correct&#8230;but it will still retard investment &#8211; why else is 3G take-up so low still in the UK after all these years&#8230;The auction basically taxed the operators to the point of collapse&#8230;the strange thing is why did those companies do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Newman</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-45196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=15162#comment-45196</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t just the decision to auction the spectrum that was a success, it was the handling of the auction itself (although I think this was probably more luck than judgement).  I think &lt;em&gt;The Undercover Economist&lt;/em&gt; went into detail about how similar auctions in other parts of the world had been biffed up royally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t just the decision to auction the spectrum that was a success, it was the handling of the auction itself (although I think this was probably more luck than judgement).  I think <em>The Undercover Economist</em> went into detail about how similar auctions in other parts of the world had been biffed up royally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Thornhill</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2010/05/19/and-now-let-us-praise-gordon-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-45194</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Thornhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=15162#comment-45194</guid>
		<description>I would not call that even &quot;Lefty&quot;.

Lefties would want monopolies, State ownership of the companies, discounts to their constituencies to allow more vote buying and probably more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not call that even &#8220;Lefty&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lefties would want monopolies, State ownership of the companies, discounts to their constituencies to allow more vote buying and probably more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 234/238 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 11:58:47 -->
