Tim Worstall

It is all obvious or trivial except…

 

 

Not sure about the details of the calculation

March 22nd, 2010 · 4 Comments

But an interesting attempt to give a sense of scale:

AXA also calculated that a woman in her mid-20s working in the private sector would have to contribute almost a quarter of her annual salary every year to get a pension comparable with a public counterpart.

Given that pensions are simply delayed compnesation that means that public sector wages are, by this measure alone, 25% higher than private sector.

OK, to be more precise, 25% minus whatever pension contribution that public sector workers have to make themselves. Different schemes have different amounts but for some reason 6% sticks in the mind. So 19% then.

Share

Tags: Your Tax Money At Work

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Formertory // Mar 22, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    That’s too simple. The public sector employee gets guarantees of index-linked future income regardless of investment performance. The private sector employee gets no such guarantee.

    The existence of that pension guarantee is worth money.

  • 2 Chris strange // Mar 22, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Plus the public sector worker will have a much higher take home pay as well.

  • 3 FCAblog // Mar 22, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    And the public sector worker can often wangle early retirement without actuarial discount.

  • 4 RH // Mar 23, 2010 at 12:17 am

    And don’t forget the value of their lump sum payment on retirement.

Leave a Comment