<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Didn&#8217;t someone try this before?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Newman</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38114</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38114</guid>
		<description>Dredging canals?  One of those jobs which sounds easy but, I suspect, isn&#039;t.

Especially for an unfit, fat knacker who on Friday was  the floor manager in a call centre.

FFS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dredging canals?  One of those jobs which sounds easy but, I suspect, isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Especially for an unfit, fat knacker who on Friday was  the floor manager in a call centre.</p>
<p>FFS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Remittance Man</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38110</link>
		<dc:creator>The Remittance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38110</guid>
		<description>btw As for National Service, it works fine if what you want is a huge reserve of trained light infantrymen whose only task would be to run to the mountauins and act like better trained Mujahadeen in defence of the nation. Sadly Britain doesn&#039;t fight that sort of war.

Britain&#039;s warfighting strategy is based on expeditionary forces capable of being deployed at short notice. This requires professionals, not semi trained conscripts and reservists. 

National service actually deprives the frontline army of trained professionals as they tend to get sucked into the massive training organisation. Indeed, according to Basil Liddle Hart (a not completely thick military thinker) in The Future of War, the ending of National Service in the UK actually enabled an increase in the number of professionally manned fighting formations.
Applying that same thinking to non-military service I imagine the same results would occur.

So, quite apart from the obvious moral objections, National Service is about the most inefficient way to get something done. Unless, of course, your objective is not to achieve the stated aims, but something more subtle. Like a little social conditioning for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw As for National Service, it works fine if what you want is a huge reserve of trained light infantrymen whose only task would be to run to the mountauins and act like better trained Mujahadeen in defence of the nation. Sadly Britain doesn&#8217;t fight that sort of war.</p>
<p>Britain&#8217;s warfighting strategy is based on expeditionary forces capable of being deployed at short notice. This requires professionals, not semi trained conscripts and reservists. </p>
<p>National service actually deprives the frontline army of trained professionals as they tend to get sucked into the massive training organisation. Indeed, according to Basil Liddle Hart (a not completely thick military thinker) in The Future of War, the ending of National Service in the UK actually enabled an increase in the number of professionally manned fighting formations.<br />
Applying that same thinking to non-military service I imagine the same results would occur.</p>
<p>So, quite apart from the obvious moral objections, National Service is about the most inefficient way to get something done. Unless, of course, your objective is not to achieve the stated aims, but something more subtle. Like a little social conditioning for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Remittance Man</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38107</link>
		<dc:creator>The Remittance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38107</guid>
		<description>At first glance one would think that the assorted voluntary youth organisations pretty much cover all this; indeed the Scouts, the cadets, Boys/Girls Brigades and even the bloody Woodcraft Folk pretty much do. 

The only problems are that they are not organised centrally (under a suitably indoctrinated Reichsjugendführer) and sometimes display a distressing allegiance to unapproved things (flag, monarchy etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance one would think that the assorted voluntary youth organisations pretty much cover all this; indeed the Scouts, the cadets, Boys/Girls Brigades and even the bloody Woodcraft Folk pretty much do. </p>
<p>The only problems are that they are not organised centrally (under a suitably indoctrinated Reichsjugendführer) and sometimes display a distressing allegiance to unapproved things (flag, monarchy etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38087</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38087</guid>
		<description>Serfdom is not acceptable in the UK.

If they want to do something for the young unemployed, then it should be voluntary. Give them a training allowance to cover travel expenses, insurance, etc, and let them sort out a work placement for themselves for say 3 to 6 months. so they get a chance to learn, and build up a track record of brownie points, new skills, and experience to go on a CV. Make it easy for potential employers to give them a chance, regardless of whether they want to be binmen, bishops or lion tamers, so long as they have a valid employer. But all the government ever does is make such things difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serfdom is not acceptable in the UK.</p>
<p>If they want to do something for the young unemployed, then it should be voluntary. Give them a training allowance to cover travel expenses, insurance, etc, and let them sort out a work placement for themselves for say 3 to 6 months. so they get a chance to learn, and build up a track record of brownie points, new skills, and experience to go on a CV. Make it easy for potential employers to give them a chance, regardless of whether they want to be binmen, bishops or lion tamers, so long as they have a valid employer. But all the government ever does is make such things difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38082</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38082</guid>
		<description>Winston, I know, but the Swiss do it better. Maybe it is because they keep their rifle at home and can buy it when they leave. It&#039;s much harder for a government not to pay attention to the people when so many of the people are armed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winston, I know, but the Swiss do it better. Maybe it is because they keep their rifle at home and can buy it when they leave. It&#8217;s much harder for a government not to pay attention to the people when so many of the people are armed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, follower of Deornoth</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38081</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, follower of Deornoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be a conscientious objector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be a conscientious objector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38078</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38078</guid>
		<description>Ed, most northern European countries have a variety of national service, either military or civic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, most northern European countries have a variety of national service, either military or civic.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_service" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_service</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38076</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38076</guid>
		<description>The Swiss seem to have found a way of making national service work, without becoming a totalitarian state like the other examples you highlighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Swiss seem to have found a way of making national service work, without becoming a totalitarian state like the other examples you highlighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longrider &#187; National Service Again</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38073</link>
		<dc:creator>Longrider &#187; National Service Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38073</guid>
		<description>[...] Timmy&#160;I see that Demos has jumped on the enforced servitude idea so beloved of control freaks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timmy&nbsp;I see that Demos has jumped on the enforced servitude idea so beloved of control freaks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/12/06/didnt-someone-try-this-before/comment-page-1/#comment-38071</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11624#comment-38071</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;d have time for a (considerable) variant on this. A&quot;Civic Corps&quot; or whatever you want to call it that anyone may join and which may be left at one months notice.   No possibility of the sack, hence military discipline. After completion of basic training (and any disciplinarians accrued) anyone may leave on one week&#039;s notice. Minimum wage, docked for accommodation during basic training but not afterwards. Any housing/accommodation needs to be sorted separately after basic training.
 I doubt it would be anyone&#039;s first choice of employment- but for those who really can&#039;t find a job it would guarantee them a minimum wage, maintain their human capital and leave the free to go to something better as soon as that something arises.
The disabled could also join- and the able bodied could be tasked with caring for them.
With this in place we could time limit unemployment pay- since long term everyone has a guaranteed job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;d have time for a (considerable) variant on this. A&#8221;Civic Corps&#8221; or whatever you want to call it that anyone may join and which may be left at one months notice.   No possibility of the sack, hence military discipline. After completion of basic training (and any disciplinarians accrued) anyone may leave on one week&#8217;s notice. Minimum wage, docked for accommodation during basic training but not afterwards. Any housing/accommodation needs to be sorted separately after basic training.<br />
 I doubt it would be anyone&#8217;s first choice of employment- but for those who really can&#8217;t find a job it would guarantee them a minimum wage, maintain their human capital and leave the free to go to something better as soon as that something arises.<br />
The disabled could also join- and the able bodied could be tasked with caring for them.<br />
With this in place we could time limit unemployment pay- since long term everyone has a guaranteed job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 324/328 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 11:39:32 -->
