Tim Worstall

9 responses so far ↓

• 1 Unity // Nov 13, 2009 at 2:25 pm

  Careful, he’ll be calling you a pendant, next…

• 2 ukliberty // Nov 13, 2009 at 3:26 pm

  Dunning-Kruger effect.

• 3 mdc // Nov 13, 2009 at 5:32 pm

  As hilarious as Murphy is, couldn’t you limit the Murphy-related stuff to say one jumbo post per week?

• 4 The Great Simpleton // Nov 13, 2009 at 7:19 pm

  Murphy isn’t hilarious, he’s dangerous.

• 5 Kay Tie // Nov 13, 2009 at 8:23 pm

  Murphy isn’t hilarious, he’s dangerous.

  He won’t be dangerous in the near future: he will be scrabbling for a living from a diminishing pool of money. His source of tax-payer cash will be cut off when NEF loses its funding. He won’t be making money from the TUC when they lose their “modernisation” money. And he won’t be making money writing drivel for the Guardian when they lose their income from advertising Government non-jobs.

• 6 dearieme // Nov 13, 2009 at 11:16 pm

  Och, he’s just Polly in drag.

• 7 The Great Simpleton // Nov 13, 2009 at 11:48 pm

  Kay Tie,

  We live in hope.

• 8 Surreptitious Evil // Nov 14, 2009 at 8:48 am

  Dearieme,

  What a horrid, horrid thought.

  Going to get the mind-bleach.

• 9 Kay Tie // Nov 14, 2009 at 11:45 am

  We live in hope.

  I certainly do. When the cuts come, which will the Tories make:

  (a) chopping the likes of NEF, an obscure lefty fake charity that the public won’t even understand what it is, let alone why it was funded, or

  (b) a few doctors and nurses.

  The money poured into lefty fronts over the decade is an outrage. Cutting the flow of cash dead is a no-brainer when looking for cuts. Personally, I’d look long and hard at drafting a windfall tax on those who ran these fake charities.

Leave a Comment