<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh my&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omri</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37038</link>
		<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37038</guid>
		<description>Lucky indeed. Now &quot;we&quot; can get into all sorts of embarrassing international misadventures trying to procure uranium. Just like France!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky indeed. Now &#8220;we&#8221; can get into all sorts of embarrassing international misadventures trying to procure uranium. Just like France!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37037</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37037</guid>
		<description>@4 yes we do; no they don&#039;t; no there isn&#039;t; yes we can. Otherwise, spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4 yes we do; no they don&#8217;t; no there isn&#8217;t; yes we can. Otherwise, spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37031</guid>
		<description>Luis - keep the price down in an election year (not saying it was done in an election year or that was the motive but just as an idea?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis &#8211; keep the price down in an election year (not saying it was done in an election year or that was the motive but just as an idea?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37016</guid>
		<description>We won&#039;t be building nuclear plants anytime soon though. Firstly we don&#039;t have the engineers to do it, secondly many of the hi tech parts come from Japan and there is a big backlog.
You could also add that we probably won&#039;t be able to afford them, but that goes without saying really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We won&#8217;t be building nuclear plants anytime soon though. Firstly we don&#8217;t have the engineers to do it, secondly many of the hi tech parts come from Japan and there is a big backlog.<br />
You could also add that we probably won&#8217;t be able to afford them, but that goes without saying really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Enrique</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37010</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37010</guid>
		<description>why would the US being doing what&#039;s claimed above?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would the US being doing what&#8217;s claimed above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serf</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-37008</link>
		<dc:creator>Serf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-37008</guid>
		<description>I have attended lectures by Fatih Birol, and he always highlights potential risks to his forecasts.

More scaremongering by greenies.

Luis,

The over stated reserves are not those of the major oil companies, but of the state owned ones. So if this turns out to be true, Exxon is quids in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have attended lectures by Fatih Birol, and he always highlights potential risks to his forecasts.</p>
<p>More scaremongering by greenies.</p>
<p>Luis,</p>
<p>The over stated reserves are not those of the major oil companies, but of the state owned ones. So if this turns out to be true, Exxon is quids in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Enrique</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/11/10/oh-my-5/comment-page-1/#comment-36997</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=11001#comment-36997</guid>
		<description>In whose interest would it be to conceal looming shortages? 

Would the share prices of the oil companies rise or fall, if expected reserves &amp; future discoveries were revised downwards? On the one hand, of course, there&#039;s less oil to be taken out of the ground and sold - that makes the oil companies less valuable - but on the other hand, the price at which they&#039;ll sell the oil is likely to be much higher. 

it&#039;s all very well saying &#039;politicians&#039; are fibbing to prevent a panic, but if the oil companies thought panic would be profitable, I suspect we&#039;d be panicking. 

On the other hand, if they are fibbing about likely future oil flows, the oil companies cannot play that game forever; the share price will fall when truth outs. Watch out for insider share sales, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In whose interest would it be to conceal looming shortages? </p>
<p>Would the share prices of the oil companies rise or fall, if expected reserves &amp; future discoveries were revised downwards? On the one hand, of course, there&#8217;s less oil to be taken out of the ground and sold &#8211; that makes the oil companies less valuable &#8211; but on the other hand, the price at which they&#8217;ll sell the oil is likely to be much higher. </p>
<p>it&#8217;s all very well saying &#8216;politicians&#8217; are fibbing to prevent a panic, but if the oil companies thought panic would be profitable, I suspect we&#8217;d be panicking. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if they are fibbing about likely future oil flows, the oil companies cannot play that game forever; the share price will fall when truth outs. Watch out for insider share sales, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 252/252 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 12:45:19 -->
