<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Rohypnol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:04:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36233</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36233</guid>
		<description>I must admit to having read the Guardian on most days in the last ten years and not realised that the drugging of women in bars with Rohypnol was one of their sacred cows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit to having read the Guardian on most days in the last ten years and not realised that the drugging of women in bars with Rohypnol was one of their sacred cows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36224</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36224</guid>
		<description>A few years ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6WHN-4GR8H68-2&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=f90cd12bfe60c4d53863d5068c802508&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Forensic Science Service published a paper&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;outlines the toxicology results from 1014 cases of claimed drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) analysed at the Forensic Science Service, London Laboratory between January 2000 and December 2002. Where appropriate, either a whole blood sample and/or a urine sample was analysed for alcohol, common drugs of abuse and potentially stupefying drugs. The results were interpreted with respect to the number of drugs detected and an attempt was made to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary ingestion from information supplied. Alcohol (either alone or with an illicit and/or medicinal drug) was detected in 470 of all cases (46%). Illicit drugs were detected in 344 cases (34%), with cannabis being the most commonly detected (26% of cases), followed by cocaine (11%). In 21 cases (2%), a sedative or disinhibiting drug was detected which had not been admitted and could therefore be an instance of deliberate spiking. This included three cases in which complainants were allegedly given Ecstasy (MDMA) without their knowledge. Other drugs detected included gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) and the benzodiazepine drugs diazepam and temazepam. Another nine cases (1%) involved the complainant being either given or forced to ingest pharmaceutical tablets or an illicit drug.outlines the toxicology results from 1014 cases of claimed drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) analysed at the Forensic Science Service, London Laboratory between January 2000 and December 2002. Where appropriate, either a whole blood sample and/or a urine sample was analysed for alcohol, common drugs of abuse and potentially stupefying drugs. The results were interpreted with respect to the number of drugs detected and an attempt was made to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary ingestion from information supplied. Alcohol (either alone or with an illicit and/or medicinal drug) was detected in 470 of all cases (46%). Illicit drugs were detected in 344 cases (34%), with cannabis being the most commonly detected (26% of cases), followed by cocaine (11%). In 21 cases (2%), a sedative or disinhibiting drug was detected which had not been admitted and could therefore be an instance of deliberate spiking. This included three cases in which complainants were allegedly given Ecstasy (MDMA) without their knowledge. Other drugs detected included gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) and the benzodiazepine drugs diazepam and temazepam. Another nine cases (1%) involved the complainant being either given or forced to ingest pharmaceutical tablets or an illicit drug.&lt;/blockquote&gt;USA studies have reached similar conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6WHN-4GR8H68-2&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=f90cd12bfe60c4d53863d5068c802508" rel="nofollow">the Forensic Science Service published a paper</a>:<br />
<blockquote>outlines the toxicology results from 1014 cases of claimed drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) analysed at the Forensic Science Service, London Laboratory between January 2000 and December 2002. Where appropriate, either a whole blood sample and/or a urine sample was analysed for alcohol, common drugs of abuse and potentially stupefying drugs. The results were interpreted with respect to the number of drugs detected and an attempt was made to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary ingestion from information supplied. Alcohol (either alone or with an illicit and/or medicinal drug) was detected in 470 of all cases (46%). Illicit drugs were detected in 344 cases (34%), with cannabis being the most commonly detected (26% of cases), followed by cocaine (11%). In 21 cases (2%), a sedative or disinhibiting drug was detected which had not been admitted and could therefore be an instance of deliberate spiking. This included three cases in which complainants were allegedly given Ecstasy (MDMA) without their knowledge. Other drugs detected included gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) and the benzodiazepine drugs diazepam and temazepam. Another nine cases (1%) involved the complainant being either given or forced to ingest pharmaceutical tablets or an illicit drug.outlines the toxicology results from 1014 cases of claimed drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) analysed at the Forensic Science Service, London Laboratory between January 2000 and December 2002. Where appropriate, either a whole blood sample and/or a urine sample was analysed for alcohol, common drugs of abuse and potentially stupefying drugs. The results were interpreted with respect to the number of drugs detected and an attempt was made to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary ingestion from information supplied. Alcohol (either alone or with an illicit and/or medicinal drug) was detected in 470 of all cases (46%). Illicit drugs were detected in 344 cases (34%), with cannabis being the most commonly detected (26% of cases), followed by cocaine (11%). In 21 cases (2%), a sedative or disinhibiting drug was detected which had not been admitted and could therefore be an instance of deliberate spiking. This included three cases in which complainants were allegedly given Ecstasy (MDMA) without their knowledge. Other drugs detected included gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) and the benzodiazepine drugs diazepam and temazepam. Another nine cases (1%) involved the complainant being either given or forced to ingest pharmaceutical tablets or an illicit drug.</p></blockquote>
<p>USA studies have reached similar conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Remittance Man</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36220</link>
		<dc:creator>The Remittance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36220</guid>
		<description>Julia,

My guess is they&#039;ll ignore it, hoping that lack of publicity kills it off before it can slaughter one of their sacred cows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia,</p>
<p>My guess is they&#8217;ll ignore it, hoping that lack of publicity kills it off before it can slaughter one of their sacred cows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuliaM</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36199</link>
		<dc:creator>JuliaM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36199</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t &lt;i&gt;wait&lt;/i&gt; to see the harpies at the Grauniad start to tear their hair out over this one, mind you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t <i>wait</i> to see the harpies at the Grauniad start to tear their hair out over this one, mind you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuliaM</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36198</link>
		<dc:creator>JuliaM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36198</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Or perhaps its a convenient excuse for the self inflicted wounds of getting so pissed that they have no idea whats going on and regret what they did the next morning.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

Yup, that too...

@Ross Heh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Or perhaps its a convenient excuse for the self inflicted wounds of getting so pissed that they have no idea whats going on and regret what they did the next morning.&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>Yup, that too&#8230;</p>
<p>@Ross Heh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36197</guid>
		<description>Well if you have a better explanation for how a you woman in a club starts feeling giddy and disoriented after 5 or 6 drinks and becomes willing to sleep with men she would not otherwise have done so.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you have a better explanation for how a you woman in a club starts feeling giddy and disoriented after 5 or 6 drinks and becomes willing to sleep with men she would not otherwise have done so&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Simpleton</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/27/on-rohypnol/comment-page-1/#comment-36196</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Simpleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10599#comment-36196</guid>
		<description>Or perhaps its a convenient excuse for the self inflicted wounds of getting so pissed that they have no idea whats going on and regret what they did the next morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps its a convenient excuse for the self inflicted wounds of getting so pissed that they have no idea whats going on and regret what they did the next morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
