<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nothing like a liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:48:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Remittance Man</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35426</link>
		<dc:creator>The Remittance Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35426</guid>
		<description>So if a 79% majority can discriminate against a 21% minority, I guess that means the smaller minorities are fair game  too. That&#039;s the homosexuals (both sexes), the non-native Brits, the disabled and assorted religious groups all stuffed then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a 79% majority can discriminate against a 21% minority, I guess that means the smaller minorities are fair game  too. That&#8217;s the homosexuals (both sexes), the non-native Brits, the disabled and assorted religious groups all stuffed then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8230;..which is worse? &#171; And there was me thinking&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35382</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8230;..which is worse? &#171; And there was me thinking&#8230;..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35382</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggy for the phrase. H/T Timmy for the heads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leggy for the phrase. H/T Timmy for the heads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35379</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35379</guid>
		<description>&quot;pubs would ban it themselves in order to save their trade.&quot;

Just as the restaurant I dined in while in Paris banned speaking English in order to appease its bigoted French customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pubs would ban it themselves in order to save their trade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just as the restaurant I dined in while in Paris banned speaking English in order to appease its bigoted French customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35376</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35376</guid>
		<description>Many fraudulant studies show second hand smoke to be harmful. Genuine studies vary from showing a benefit to showing harm, and they average out as showing no effect. This of course is because any study involves sampling, and thus random error. Of course one of the principal frauds employed is to ignore those studies which do not show harm.
 Secondly, no-one is obliged to go to a pub orto work in one- so anyone who dislikes smoke for any reason has an alternative. Indeed if there are as many as suggested then there would be no need for a smoking ban, the pubs would ban it themselves in order to save their trade.
 An example of someone who has failed to convince the people of his point of view even by the use of lies and seeks to bully people to get his own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many fraudulant studies show second hand smoke to be harmful. Genuine studies vary from showing a benefit to showing harm, and they average out as showing no effect. This of course is because any study involves sampling, and thus random error. Of course one of the principal frauds employed is to ignore those studies which do not show harm.<br />
 Secondly, no-one is obliged to go to a pub orto work in one- so anyone who dislikes smoke for any reason has an alternative. Indeed if there are as many as suggested then there would be no need for a smoking ban, the pubs would ban it themselves in order to save their trade.<br />
 An example of someone who has failed to convince the people of his point of view even by the use of lies and seeks to bully people to get his own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35369</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35369</guid>
		<description>&quot;Someone needs a lift to the grip shop.&quot;

What a great comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Someone needs a lift to the grip shop.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a great comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gasman</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35362</link>
		<dc:creator>Gasman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35362</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have thought that after the crap that has passed for legislation over the last decade or so we&#039;d be keen to avoid any more just to &quot;send a message&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have thought that after the crap that has passed for legislation over the last decade or so we&#8217;d be keen to avoid any more just to &#8220;send a message&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuliaM</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35357</link>
		<dc:creator>JuliaM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35357</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s getting a well deserved kicking in the comments. Which I suppose is &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s getting a well deserved kicking in the comments. Which I suppose is <i>something</i>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/10/11/nothing-like-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-35354</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=10194#comment-35354</guid>
		<description>&quot;Smoking should be banned in cars, and particularly any vehicle with children in it.&quot;

We should disregard this merely for the idea of particularly banning something already banned. Away to the Grammar Gulag with them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Smoking should be banned in cars, and particularly any vehicle with children in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>We should disregard this merely for the idea of particularly banning something already banned. Away to the Grammar Gulag with them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 10:08:31 -->
