<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ritchie discovers the British tax system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:22:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now my advice for those who die &#8211; Declare the pennies on your eyes &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-41044</link>
		<dc:creator>Now my advice for those who die &#8211; Declare the pennies on your eyes &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-41044</guid>
		<description>[...] must be cut too. Even if &#8220;the rich&#8221; were taxed 100%, it would still raise nowhere near enough to fund the current expenditures of the British [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] must be cut too. Even if &#8220;the rich&#8221; were taxed 100%, it would still raise nowhere near enough to fund the current expenditures of the British [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Quite Hayek</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-33035</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Quite Hayek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-33035</guid>
		<description>He really is one of the most obnoxious cunts I&#039;ve never met.

Can I use the word &#039;cunt&#039;?

In any case, I just have and Richard Murphy still is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He really is one of the most obnoxious cunts I&#8217;ve never met.</p>
<p>Can I use the word &#8216;cunt&#8217;?</p>
<p>In any case, I just have and Richard Murphy still is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-33006</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-33006</guid>
		<description>You do a fine job of demolishing the feeble-minded Ritchie.  I guess there must be a question as to whether he is influential enough to be worth demolishing, or whether he is widely recognised as a pitiful idiot and you unfortunately add to his limited credibility by responding to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do a fine job of demolishing the feeble-minded Ritchie.  I guess there must be a question as to whether he is influential enough to be worth demolishing, or whether he is widely recognised as a pitiful idiot and you unfortunately add to his limited credibility by responding to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiCitizenOne</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-33001</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiCitizenOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-33001</guid>
		<description>Why are the rich paying more?  They do more for the country by being productive and that&#039;s why they&#039;re wealthy!

The only fair share is an equal share. i.e. everyone must be charged the same.

Discrimination against the productive is the worst possible thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the rich paying more?  They do more for the country by being productive and that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re wealthy!</p>
<p>The only fair share is an equal share. i.e. everyone must be charged the same.</p>
<p>Discrimination against the productive is the worst possible thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bennett</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-32996</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-32996</guid>
		<description>Why stop at the rich? Let&#039;s have everyone paying a fair share. I pay for what I use, you pay for what you use and all the welfare and state sector parasites  pay for what they use.

That&#039;s fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why stop at the rich? Let&#8217;s have everyone paying a fair share. I pay for what I use, you pay for what you use and all the welfare and state sector parasites  pay for what they use.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffH</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-32995</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-32995</guid>
		<description>It all boils down to this: &quot;to make sure that the richest in the UK pay a fair share.&quot;

It all depends on what you mean by &quot;fair&quot;.  For the Richards of this world, what the &quot;rich&quot; pay is never &quot;fair&quot; enough for them.

For me, and I&#039;m not one of the richest but still a higher rate tax-payer, I already pay more than my &quot;fair&quot; share.

When the top 10 per cent (approx) pay 90 per cent of all income tax receipts then we&#039;ve gone way beyond &quot;fair&quot; and into &quot;theft&quot; territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all boils down to this: &#8220;to make sure that the richest in the UK pay a fair share.&#8221;</p>
<p>It all depends on what you mean by &#8220;fair&#8221;.  For the Richards of this world, what the &#8220;rich&#8221; pay is never &#8220;fair&#8221; enough for them.</p>
<p>For me, and I&#8217;m not one of the richest but still a higher rate tax-payer, I already pay more than my &#8220;fair&#8221; share.</p>
<p>When the top 10 per cent (approx) pay 90 per cent of all income tax receipts then we&#8217;ve gone way beyond &#8220;fair&#8221; and into &#8220;theft&#8221; territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-32990</link>
		<dc:creator>And</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-32990</guid>
		<description>Excellent.

The comments on Murphy&#039;s piece contain this belter, from the man himself

&quot;So very politely, stop talking complete nonsense and stop telling me I’m confused: I think it is you who needs serious help with your delusions - because that is what they are&quot; 

If he didn&#039;t exist (and he does, I met him in the days when he was more than happy to advise those despicable rich foreigner non-doms, albeit badly, on how to avoid paying tax) someone with too much time on their hands would have to invent him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.</p>
<p>The comments on Murphy&#8217;s piece contain this belter, from the man himself</p>
<p>&#8220;So very politely, stop talking complete nonsense and stop telling me I’m confused: I think it is you who needs serious help with your delusions &#8211; because that is what they are&#8221; </p>
<p>If he didn&#8217;t exist (and he does, I met him in the days when he was more than happy to advise those despicable rich foreigner non-doms, albeit badly, on how to avoid paying tax) someone with too much time on their hands would have to invent him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obnoxio The Clown</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/31/ritchie-discovers-the-british-tax-system/comment-page-1/#comment-32980</link>
		<dc:creator>Obnoxio The Clown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=9048#comment-32980</guid>
		<description>Mind if I nick this? I couldn&#039;t put it any better if I tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind if I nick this? I couldn&#8217;t put it any better if I tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 266/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 15:25:54 -->
