<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caroline Lucas speaks out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/comment-page-1/#comment-32089</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8580#comment-32089</guid>
		<description>Re Severn Barrage, it depends on whom you mean by &quot;we&quot;. AFAIAC, the government shouldn&#039;t spend a penny on this - what they should do is auction off the licence to build it, whoever offers most, builds it and keeps the profits if they calculated correctly and loses everything if they calculated wrong.

If no private company is prepared to pay a positive sum, then it doesn&#039;t get built, problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Severn Barrage, it depends on whom you mean by &#8220;we&#8221;. AFAIAC, the government shouldn&#8217;t spend a penny on this &#8211; what they should do is auction off the licence to build it, whoever offers most, builds it and keeps the profits if they calculated correctly and loses everything if they calculated wrong.</p>
<p>If no private company is prepared to pay a positive sum, then it doesn&#8217;t get built, problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/comment-page-1/#comment-32087</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8580#comment-32087</guid>
		<description>Seems very unlikely that a car park on the location of a rural church would have any value at all- who would pay to park there? and it would definitely have a cost- to construct. However it seems to me that if the people (presumably but not necessarily acting through their elected representatives) wanted a building kept and maintained, whether as a place of worship, an architectural feature, or a historic monument (or all three) they should pony up the necessary to make the car park uneconomic on any cost benefit analysis, one way or another. If no-one is prepared to do that then the people don&#039;t want the church much- even if they find it fashionable to say that they do.
Using cost benefit analysis would lead a developer to build in the plot next door, thus giving best value overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems very unlikely that a car park on the location of a rural church would have any value at all- who would pay to park there? and it would definitely have a cost- to construct. However it seems to me that if the people (presumably but not necessarily acting through their elected representatives) wanted a building kept and maintained, whether as a place of worship, an architectural feature, or a historic monument (or all three) they should pony up the necessary to make the car park uneconomic on any cost benefit analysis, one way or another. If no-one is prepared to do that then the people don&#8217;t want the church much- even if they find it fashionable to say that they do.<br />
Using cost benefit analysis would lead a developer to build in the plot next door, thus giving best value overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Enrique</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/comment-page-1/#comment-32053</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8580#comment-32053</guid>
		<description>Newmania, 

what sort of cost-benefit analysis would tell you that car parks are worth more than Early Saxon Churches? If cost-benefit analysis as knuckle-headed as that, then I&#039;m with you. If cost-benefit analysis is flexible enough to handle &quot;things of value based on more than their market revenue generating capacity&quot;, then I&#039;m not.   I don&#039;t actually know anything about the reality of cost-benefit analysis, so perhaps it really is knuckle-headed ... can anybody enlighten me? 

(although someone&#039;s going to pop up and tell me that unless something is priced by the voluntary exchange in a market, it cannot have a value. I can just feel it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newmania, </p>
<p>what sort of cost-benefit analysis would tell you that car parks are worth more than Early Saxon Churches? If cost-benefit analysis as knuckle-headed as that, then I&#8217;m with you. If cost-benefit analysis is flexible enough to handle &#8220;things of value based on more than their market revenue generating capacity&#8221;, then I&#8217;m not.   I don&#8217;t actually know anything about the reality of cost-benefit analysis, so perhaps it really is knuckle-headed &#8230; can anybody enlighten me? </p>
<p>(although someone&#8217;s going to pop up and tell me that unless something is priced by the voluntary exchange in a market, it cannot have a value. I can just feel it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newmania</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/14/caroline-lucas-speaks-out/comment-page-1/#comment-32046</link>
		<dc:creator>Newmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8580#comment-32046</guid>
		<description>Bollocks bollocks bollocks  .You may wish to covert every early Saxon Church in Sussex  into a Car park on   a cost analysis basis ;  I do not .
Whilst I loathe Caroline Lucas, &#039;cost&#039; is not the only issue  ever  ,and   this  shows why scientific and economic  problems should never be left to scienists or economists 
If they were  left   to those with degrees in English Literature that would suit me fine. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollocks bollocks bollocks  .You may wish to covert every early Saxon Church in Sussex  into a Car park on   a cost analysis basis ;  I do not .<br />
Whilst I loathe Caroline Lucas, &#8216;cost&#8217; is not the only issue  ever  ,and   this  shows why scientific and economic  problems should never be left to scienists or economists<br />
If they were  left   to those with degrees in English Literature that would suit me fine. <img src='http://timworstall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 210/211 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 14:11:37 -->
