Can art succeed where science is proving insufficient to generate the will to act effectively on climate change?
If you\’re going to do things like this:
In 1982 she planted wheat on two acres of wasteland on Battery Park, two blocks from Wall Street; her harvest was worth £158, produced on land valued at $4.5bn.
No.
There is simply no way that that sort of return on an asset is \”effective\”.
Its not all about the bread man , its about the bread
If it was wasteland not being otherwise used, it was worth it.
If that were the case, it seems unlikely the land would be valued at $4.5bn.