<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry Vince?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2009/07/05/sorry-vince/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/05/sorry-vince/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathan Pearce</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/05/sorry-vince/comment-page-1/#comment-31588</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8317#comment-31588</guid>
		<description>There has been quite an active media campaign - not necessarily concerted - to have V. Cable portrayed as some sort of sage of wisdom. But he isn&#039;t; much of his commentary is bog standard: &quot;we all need more regulations/taxes/clampdowns on X&quot; blah-blah. For sure, he is an economist by training, and his manner comes across well, but he&#039;s over-rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been quite an active media campaign &#8211; not necessarily concerted &#8211; to have V. Cable portrayed as some sort of sage of wisdom. But he isn&#8217;t; much of his commentary is bog standard: &#8220;we all need more regulations/taxes/clampdowns on X&#8221; blah-blah. For sure, he is an economist by training, and his manner comes across well, but he&#8217;s over-rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanW</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2009/07/05/sorry-vince/comment-page-1/#comment-31585</link>
		<dc:creator>DanW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=8317#comment-31585</guid>
		<description>Vince is well off here.  Any shares recieved are taxed as income when given.  Any subsequent gain is taxed with CGT but that is only the same is receiving a cash bonus and investing it in shares.

IMO the best way is restricted shares (i.e. cannot be sold for e.g 3 years)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince is well off here.  Any shares recieved are taxed as income when given.  Any subsequent gain is taxed with CGT but that is only the same is receiving a cash bonus and investing it in shares.</p>
<p>IMO the best way is restricted shares (i.e. cannot be sold for e.g 3 years)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 176/177 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 13:06:53 -->
