Tim Worstall

It is all obvious or trivial except…

 

 

Operation Ore

July 3rd, 2009 · 10 Comments

Looks like that edifice is finally going to come tumbling down.

A test case is to be heard in the chourt of appeal within weeks, which will challenge the investigation for the first time and could expose a “huge miscarriage of justice”, lawyers claim.

Chris Saltrese, the solicitor representing the convicted man, Anthony O’Shea, said: “If his appeal is successful the convictions of others for the same offence will fall too.

“We are talking in the hundreds and we say this is a huge miscarriage of justice.”

Share

Tags: Scams

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Andrew // Jul 3, 2009 at 10:11 am

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7340997.stm

  • 2 Obnoxio The Clown // Jul 3, 2009 at 10:37 am

    Wow, another horrific miscarriage of justice! It’s almost like there are sections of the police and CPS and judiciary who are utterly and terminally incompetent.

  • 3 ChrisM // Jul 3, 2009 at 11:15 am

    I think you are being too generous Obo. I think there are sections of those institutions that are outright evil.

  • 4 Lord T // Jul 3, 2009 at 11:35 am

    About time and can we have prosecutions of those that pushed these cases even though they knew the facts.

  • 5 JuliaM // Jul 3, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Not before time…

  • 6 Serf // Jul 3, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    So someone steals your credit card details, uses them to buy child porn, and you lose your entire life.

    Justice.

  • 7 Kay Tie // Jul 3, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Hey Andrew (or should I say Jim Gamble?), you ought to know that the truth behind that is a teensy weensy bit more complicated.

    Have a look at this instead:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/17/ore_bates_arrest/

    Something a bit more balanced. And we know what happened after: the chief constable of the arresting force nearly ended up in prison.

  • 8 john b // Jul 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Also note that neither Tim nor the Telegraph piece even referred to Bates, so bringing him in is a particularly poisonous non-sequitur (even if you believe he really was ‘disgraced’ rather than ‘disgracefully fitted up’)

  • 9 JuliaM // Jul 3, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    “..bringing him in is a particularly poisonous non-sequitur..”

    And there’s something I can agree with johnb on. See, he doesn’t always talk absolute crap.

    Unlike when he successfully tries to predict how many times false rape cases actually occur…

  • 10 Tiesto // Dec 6, 2010 at 8:48 pm

    Well the appeal failed – http://www.mearnsleader.co.uk/news/police_welcome_rejection_of_child_porn_conviction_appeal_1_404401

    So, either there is large conspiracy involving the Judiciary and Police…or the suspects were guilty all along. Interesting comments by the Judge regarding Jim Bates

    http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/o-shea-judgment-06122010.pdf

    He told a deliberate lie to the Court, according to the Judge.

Leave a Comment