http://timworstall.com/2009/06/19/strikes-again/ It is all obvious or trivial except... Fri, 25 May 2012 07:28:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://timworstall.com/2009/06/19/strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-30953 Chris Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:14:44 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=7892#comment-30953 Yes, it is ok, as Recusant notes - there's a breach of contract. The only caveat is that if anyone sacked for striking is re-hired, they all must be. Yes, it is ok, as Recusant notes – there’s a breach of contract. The only caveat is that if anyone sacked for striking is re-hired, they all must be.

]]> http://timworstall.com/2009/06/19/strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-30897 JuliaM Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:23:53 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=7892#comment-30897 Let's hope this doesn't set off a chain reaction of other wildcat strikes in support... Let’s hope this doesn’t set off a chain reaction of other wildcat strikes in support…

]]> http://timworstall.com/2009/06/19/strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-30886 Recusant Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:47:26 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=7892#comment-30886 It's an unofficial strike, without the backing of their union the GMB or a ballot so, yes, they can be sacked as they have failed to attend their place of work without good cause. It’s an unofficial strike, without the backing of their union the GMB or a ballot so, yes, they can be sacked as they have failed to attend their place of work without good cause.

]]>