<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timmy Elsewhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/12/15/timmy-elsewhere-586/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/12/15/timmy-elsewhere-586/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Potarto</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/12/15/timmy-elsewhere-586/comment-page-1/#comment-24809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Potarto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=5307#comment-24809</guid>
		<description>It would be 36,000 km above the Earth, the Earth&#039;s radius is about 6,000 km.

I see, it&#039;s describing a circle seven times larger than the Earth, so it would only be obscured by the Earth for a small period of time around midnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be 36,000 km above the Earth, the Earth&#8217;s radius is about 6,000 km.</p>
<p>I see, it&#8217;s describing a circle seven times larger than the Earth, so it would only be obscured by the Earth for a small period of time around midnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Potarto</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/12/15/timmy-elsewhere-586/comment-page-1/#comment-24804</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Potarto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/?p=5307#comment-24804</guid>
		<description>&quot;given that such systems would be in geostationary orbit we don&#039;t have to worry about night and day (or cloud cover, obviously) so we solve the storage problem as well.&quot;


Is that right?

I would have thought that geostationary orbit meant that half the time the satellite would be in darkness, producing no power.

Tim adds: Err, no. Geostationary is a long way up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;given that such systems would be in geostationary orbit we don&#8217;t have to worry about night and day (or cloud cover, obviously) so we solve the storage problem as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that right?</p>
<p>I would have thought that geostationary orbit meant that half the time the satellite would be in darkness, producing no power.</p>
<p>Tim adds: Err, no. Geostationary is a long way up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 177/177 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-25 04:15:10 -->
