Comments on: Sorry?

By: john b

john b — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:31:15 +0000

Much as Old Holborn likes to pose as some kind of Excellent Custodian Of Truth, it's the Grauniad wot revealed Mr Galley's name. And his background as a Tory activist. Wot larks, eh?

By: AntiCitizenOne

AntiCitizenOne — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:44:02 +0000

I looked in my rolling tobacco pouch and saw the name “Chris Galley”.

By: Kay Tie

Kay Tie — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:21:51 +0000

“Beware, The State is now arming itself against it’s own citizens”

The Pravda article is the only source I can find for this. Anything more, ahem, authoritative?

By: Monty

Monty — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:09:40 +0000

“The civil servant at the heart of a Whitehall leak investigation was in hiding last night”

Hang on. This guy has nothing to hide from. Anyone who humiliates the po-faced crooks in this government, is destined to become the most popular bloke in Britain. Who the hell is he being protected from?

By: Kay Tie

Kay Tie — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:13:45 +0000

“Why do the fanatical young men with the AK47s and the hand grenades never attack the right targets?”

If you just wait a bit I expect you’ll see it here too: economic crisis, severe-times-require-severe-measures, state of emergency, ‘delayed’ elections, rebel movement formed, AK-47s.

By: Old Holborn

Old Holborn — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:24:36 +0000

It gets better

Announced Today by the BBC

Alan Milburn to set up “Civilian Security Force” using military trainers, civil servants, police officers, judges and other logistical staff.

Beware, The State is now arming itself against it’s own citizens

LINK

By: The Happy Rampager

The Happy Rampager — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:15:33 +0000

@ dearieme

I suspect, as with the IRA (following that attack on the Conservative party conference of course), a certain understanding has developed between those fanatics and the ‘right targets’.

By: dearieme

dearieme — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:56:52 +0000

Why do the fanatical young men with the AK47s and the hand grenades never attack the right targets?

By: Dr Nick Ashley

Dr Nick Ashley — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:04:20 +0000

Ah, but it’s for his own good. They probably had him sectioned, as only a mad person could give this Noo Labour gov a headache by leaking information regarding their utter incompetence.

Then send out a message by having 20 anti terrorism officers terrorise DG’s home/family and office. How can his office be a scene of crime if they don’t know whether he has actually committed said crime at all? Also surely shutting down his e mail account and denying his constituents access to a man who of course is innocent until proven a Tory must be unconstitutional or illegal?

And who made the complaint? If it wasn’t a minister but someone from the cabinet office who could it be? Who’s the patsy in the book depository with the rifle without a scope?

By: JuliaM

JuliaM — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:00:42 +0000

It doesn’t say ‘detained’, it says ‘looked after’. Presumably it’s with his agreement, as it was with the unlucky scapegoat for the HMRC disc debacle.

Although who can really say….?

By: Kay Tie

Kay Tie — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:55:31 +0000

From the Daily Mash:

“His whereabouts are now unknown though Downing Street said he was in a place where he could do no more harm.”

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/war/the-purge-begins-200811281425/

By: Kay Tie

Kay Tie — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:53:37 +0000

Let us hope their duty of care has improved since the MoD “looked after” Dr. David Kelly.

By: john b

john b — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:44:09 +0000

Standard practice, AIUI – also happened to the poor sod who lost the child benefit CDs. Presumably he’s in one of the posh country retreats the Civil Service owns that normally get used for jollies^H^H training days.

By: Kit

Kit — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:35:03 +0000

Has anyone contacted the Red Cross to organize a visit and send food parcels?