Comments on: James Ford Seale http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/ It is all obvious or trivial except... Thu, 24 May 2012 23:39:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: NoJustice http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-22295 NoJustice Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:53:19 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-22295 There should be no statute of limitations for any crime that is against another human being ...if they have commited the crime they should still be punished as if it happed today, and not only that people that commit violent crimes against another human being (unless it is truely in self defence) should automaticly get life in prison without the possiblitly of parole, and this man should be in prison and his body left to rot for what he did to those men, I also believe that they should change the way they punish some of these people , for instance if someone tortures another person untill they die...they should get the exact same done to them , just as the bible says "If any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, 24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. " Exodus 21:23" There should be no statute of limitations for any crime that is against another human being …if they have commited the crime they should still be punished as if it happed today, and not only that people that commit violent crimes against another human being (unless it is truely in self defence) should automaticly get life in prison without the possiblitly of parole, and this man should be in prison and his body left to rot for what he did to those men, I also believe that they should change the way they punish some of these people , for instance if someone tortures another person untill they die…they should get the exact same done to them , just as the bible says “If any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, 24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. ” Exodus 21:23″

]]> By: Mr Potarto http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-21613 Mr Potarto Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:36:41 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-21613 So why can a witness to a kidnapping only remember five years back, but if the kidnappers subsequently murder their victim the witness' memory works in perpetuity? I would have thought the decision on the reliability of a witness would be better taken case by case. So why can a witness to a kidnapping only remember five years back, but if the kidnappers subsequently murder their victim the witness’ memory works in perpetuity?

I would have thought the decision on the reliability of a witness would be better taken case by case.

]]> By: diogenes1960 http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-21580 diogenes1960 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:50:58 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-21580 Mr Potarto - "describe for the jury what you did on the morning of September 9, 1995" Mr Potarto – “describe for the jury what you did on the morning of September 9, 1995″

]]> By: David Gillies http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-21578 David Gillies Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:51:36 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-21578 As far as I'm aware, the reasoning is that with the passage of time, the prosecution may not be able to clear the evidentiary hurdle (witnesses' memories fade, they move away, evidence deteriorates, etc..) The more serious the crime, the less weight this is given in determining whether the trial should proceed, so typically limitation periods are longer (or non-existent) for worse offences. As far as I’m aware, the reasoning is that with the passage of time, the prosecution may not be able to clear the evidentiary hurdle (witnesses’ memories fade, they move away, evidence deteriorates, etc..) The more serious the crime, the less weight this is given in determining whether the trial should proceed, so typically limitation periods are longer (or non-existent) for worse offences.

]]> By: Mr Potarto http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-21576 Mr Potarto Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:33:30 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-21576 Can anyone tell me the reasoning behind having a statute of limitations on a crime? Can anyone tell me the reasoning behind having a statute of limitations on a crime?

]]> By: constitutional http://timworstall.com/2008/09/10/james-ford-seale/comment-page-1/#comment-21572 constitutional Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:13:55 +0000 http://timworstall.com/?p=4044#comment-21572 James F. Seale, dredged up for a "show-trial" after forty-five years, in violation of the right to a speedy-trial, never "recanted" and when charges were, eventually, thrown out, Nationalists said that "the demise of usurpation by Negro judges, affirmative-action juries, Voting-Rights-Act gerrymandering and cold-case witch-hunts is hastened." http://www.nationalist.org/docs/cartoons/2007/032801.html James F. Seale, dredged up for a “show-trial” after forty-five years, in violation of the right to a speedy-trial, never “recanted” and when charges were, eventually, thrown out, Nationalists said that “the demise of usurpation by Negro judges, affirmative-action juries, Voting-Rights-Act gerrymandering and cold-case witch-hunts is hastened.”
http://www.nationalist.org/docs/cartoons/2007/032801.html

]]>