<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Favourite Tax Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An Empirical Question</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-12289</link>
		<dc:creator>An Empirical Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/#comment-12289</guid>
		<description>[...] Starting here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Starting here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The one who knows</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-12288</link>
		<dc:creator>The one who knows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/#comment-12288</guid>
		<description>Tim, 

Your entire argument is flawed. Not a single EU resident would keep a CHF deposit account due to low interest rates and currency risk. Deposits are in Euros. You didn&#039;t know Swiss banks can offer multi-currency deposits?. Also interest for Eu Savings tax, is mainly from Eurobonds. 

So you may as well delete this entire article, as it is 100% debunked. Amazing....

Tim adds: Not a single one? I am an EU resident in the euro zone and I have $, £ and € accounts. True, I don&#039;t have a CHF one, but your assertion that not one EU resident would have one seems a rather flawed assumption. I do indeed note, something which if you&#039;d bothered to parse the post, that accounts can be in Switzerland and be in other currencies than CHF. &quot;Seems like a very odd assumption to me, to be sure. I mean you can have foreign currency accounts there, for sure, but would everyone?&quot; That&#039;s something of a clue you might think.

We have an empirical question here. Murphy&#039;s calculations rest on the case that all and every one of those accounts held by EU residents is in €. There are, you might note, a number of EU residents whose domestic currency is not the €. Thus the assumption that all of them would squirrel their money away in € is highly suspect, to say the very least. But it is an empirical question: if 100% of those accounts are in € then Murphy is correct. If less than 100% he isn&#039;t. And until we find out what the percentage of accounts in € is, a factual matter, we won&#039;t know.

Finally, I do hope you know that &quot;eurobonds&quot; does not refer to bonds denominated in euros? It&#039;s a description of a legal status, not a currency one. Indeed, at least until recently (I don&#039;t know the modern figures) the largest eurobond markets were in US $. And there are GBP eurobonds, € eurobonds, CHF eurobonds, SEK eurobonds, even Yen eurobonds....

&quot;100% debunked&quot; would be slightly over-egging your pudding there I think.

Oh, and as you told me via email, there&#039;s a US $ compenent to those holdings. The $ falling quite heavily against the € in the year in question, something which would of course lower the amount of tax with held. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, </p>
<p>Your entire argument is flawed. Not a single EU resident would keep a CHF deposit account due to low interest rates and currency risk. Deposits are in Euros. You didn&#8217;t know Swiss banks can offer multi-currency deposits?. Also interest for Eu Savings tax, is mainly from Eurobonds. </p>
<p>So you may as well delete this entire article, as it is 100% debunked. Amazing&#8230;.</p>
<p>Tim adds: Not a single one? I am an EU resident in the euro zone and I have $, £ and € accounts. True, I don&#8217;t have a CHF one, but your assertion that not one EU resident would have one seems a rather flawed assumption. I do indeed note, something which if you&#8217;d bothered to parse the post, that accounts can be in Switzerland and be in other currencies than CHF. &#8220;Seems like a very odd assumption to me, to be sure. I mean you can have foreign currency accounts there, for sure, but would everyone?&#8221; That&#8217;s something of a clue you might think.</p>
<p>We have an empirical question here. Murphy&#8217;s calculations rest on the case that all and every one of those accounts held by EU residents is in €. There are, you might note, a number of EU residents whose domestic currency is not the €. Thus the assumption that all of them would squirrel their money away in € is highly suspect, to say the very least. But it is an empirical question: if 100% of those accounts are in € then Murphy is correct. If less than 100% he isn&#8217;t. And until we find out what the percentage of accounts in € is, a factual matter, we won&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Finally, I do hope you know that &#8220;eurobonds&#8221; does not refer to bonds denominated in euros? It&#8217;s a description of a legal status, not a currency one. Indeed, at least until recently (I don&#8217;t know the modern figures) the largest eurobond markets were in US $. And there are GBP eurobonds, € eurobonds, CHF eurobonds, SEK eurobonds, even Yen eurobonds&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;100% debunked&#8221; would be slightly over-egging your pudding there I think.</p>
<p>Oh, and as you told me via email, there&#8217;s a US $ compenent to those holdings. The $ falling quite heavily against the € in the year in question, something which would of course lower the amount of tax with held.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkS</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-12259</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/#comment-12259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again... he&#039;s not the sort of person you&#039;d want as your accountant, is he? So why on earth did he train as one in the first place? It&#039;s like an atheist applying to be a priest. The man&#039;s crackers! A real John the Baptist. I bet he wears a hair shirt and eats locusts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; he&#8217;s not the sort of person you&#8217;d want as your accountant, is he? So why on earth did he train as one in the first place? It&#8217;s like an atheist applying to be a priest. The man&#8217;s crackers! A real John the Baptist. I bet he wears a hair shirt and eats locusts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffH</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-12237</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/#comment-12237</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had this debate with Richard before and the answer, Kit, is &#039;Yes&#039;.

His position put simply is that its everyone&#039;s (individual and corporate entity) duty to maximise their tax payment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had this debate with Richard before and the answer, Kit, is &#8216;Yes&#8217;.</p>
<p>His position put simply is that its everyone&#8217;s (individual and corporate entity) duty to maximise their tax payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-12234</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/05/10/our-favourite-tax-expert/#comment-12234</guid>
		<description>He is also using the word &quot;avoidance&quot; (legal) rather than &quot;evasion&quot; (illegal). Or would Richard Murphy  like &quot;avoidance&quot; to be illegal too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is also using the word &#8220;avoidance&#8221; (legal) rather than &#8220;evasion&#8221; (illegal). Or would Richard Murphy  like &#8220;avoidance&#8221; to be illegal too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
