<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misunderstanding Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top UK websites, and does Google have potential to dominate? &#124; The Wardman Wire</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11756</link>
		<dc:creator>Top UK websites, and does Google have potential to dominate? &#124; The Wardman Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/#comment-11756</guid>
		<description>[...] Worstall zeroes in on and dismisses the assertion that search dominance feeds through to advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Worstall zeroes in on and dismisses the assertion that search dominance feeds through to advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Barnard</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the 35% figure refers to its revenues in 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the 35% figure refers to its revenues in 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Barnard</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/#comment-11700</guid>
		<description>Actually, Tim, most of Google&#039;s ad revenue comes from the &#039;paid search&#039; ads that appear alongside the natural search results. Only 35% of its total ad revenues came from serving ads to third-party websites - see the Annual Report (http://investor.google.com/pdf/2007_Google_AnnualReport.pdf) for details.

Of course, Google&#039;s dominance of this market will continue only as long as it continues to provide the best search results: if a better competitor comes along, it will cost consumers and advertisers nothing to switch their custom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Tim, most of Google&#8217;s ad revenue comes from the &#8216;paid search&#8217; ads that appear alongside the natural search results. Only 35% of its total ad revenues came from serving ads to third-party websites &#8211; see the Annual Report (<a href="http://investor.google.com/pdf/2007_Google_AnnualReport.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://investor.google.com/pdf/2007_Google_AnnualReport.pdf</a>) for details.</p>
<p>Of course, Google&#8217;s dominance of this market will continue only as long as it continues to provide the best search results: if a better competitor comes along, it will cost consumers and advertisers nothing to switch their custom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Barnard</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/04/29/misunderstanding-google/#comment-11699</guid>
		<description>Actually, Tim, most of Google&#039;s ad revenue comes from the &#039;paid search&#039; ads that appear alongside the natural search results. Only 35% of its total ad revenues came from serving ads to third-party websites (see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://investor.google.com/pdf/2007_Google_AnnualReport.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Annual Report&lt;/a&gt; for details).

Of course, Google&#039;s dominance of this market will continue only as long as it continues to provide the best search results: if a better competitor comes along, it will cost consumers and advertisers nothing to switch their custom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Tim, most of Google&#8217;s ad revenue comes from the &#8216;paid search&#8217; ads that appear alongside the natural search results. Only 35% of its total ad revenues came from serving ads to third-party websites (see the <a href="http://investor.google.com/pdf/2007_Google_AnnualReport.pdf" rel="nofollow">Annual Report</a> for details).</p>
<p>Of course, Google&#8217;s dominance of this market will continue only as long as it continues to provide the best search results: if a better competitor comes along, it will cost consumers and advertisers nothing to switch their custom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
