<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timmy Elsewhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rv</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/comment-page-1/#comment-8428</link>
		<dc:creator>rv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/#comment-8428</guid>
		<description>The Daily Telegraph headline was &quot;&#039;Nine in 10 UK jobs go to foreigners&#039;&quot;. Which takes something that wasn&#039;t really true and makes it even worse.

Tim, is it right to say - 90% of the jobs created in the economy not taken by the already employed have gone to foreigners. I guess these additional jobs have to go the unemployed or incomers. And to no-one&#039;s surprise economic migrants are far more likely to gain employment than the longterm employed.

Also what is your opinion of what happens to the economy if a lot of the Poles (and others)  go home? The Frank Field suggestion seems to be that our jobless would step in.  But that seems unlikely to me.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/03/nmigrant103.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Daily Telegraph headline was &#8220;&#8216;Nine in 10 UK jobs go to foreigners&#8217;&#8221;. Which takes something that wasn&#8217;t really true and makes it even worse.</p>
<p>Tim, is it right to say &#8211; 90% of the jobs created in the economy not taken by the already employed have gone to foreigners. I guess these additional jobs have to go the unemployed or incomers. And to no-one&#8217;s surprise economic migrants are far more likely to gain employment than the longterm employed.</p>
<p>Also what is your opinion of what happens to the economy if a lot of the Poles (and others)  go home? The Frank Field suggestion seems to be that our jobless would step in.  But that seems unlikely to me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/03/nmigrant103.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/03/nmigrant103.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/comment-page-1/#comment-8422</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/#comment-8422</guid>
		<description>&quot;His most famous book is called The Wealth of Nations, of which every literate person has heard. However, no one reads this book any longer: it therefore can be said to have acquired the status of a true classic&quot;

Not true - I read it last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;His most famous book is called The Wealth of Nations, of which every literate person has heard. However, no one reads this book any longer: it therefore can be said to have acquired the status of a true classic&#8221;</p>
<p>Not true &#8211; I read it last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/comment-page-1/#comment-8421</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/03/03/timmy-elsewhere-238/#comment-8421</guid>
		<description>Just because 23m jobs have been created in the last ten years (possibly more - a university study found 2.7m private-sector jobs created in 2006 and 2.6m lost)  it does not necessarily follow that &quot;the vast majority of all jobs in the UK have in fact been created in the past decade&quot;. They could be the same jobs each year that get created and destroyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because 23m jobs have been created in the last ten years (possibly more &#8211; a university study found 2.7m private-sector jobs created in 2006 and 2.6m lost)  it does not necessarily follow that &#8220;the vast majority of all jobs in the UK have in fact been created in the past decade&#8221;. They could be the same jobs each year that get created and destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 200/204 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 10:41:50 -->
