<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polly on Tax Avoidance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emma</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8903</link>
		<dc:creator>emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8903</guid>
		<description>had a look at Morrisons tax rate announced today?  looks like their tax deot is doing something right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had a look at Morrisons tax rate announced today?  looks like their tax deot is doing something right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffH</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8268</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8268</guid>
		<description>Having had a run-in with Herr Murphy he&#039;s taken to removing things that discomfit him.  For the blog record:

&quot;So, eventually you just give up and delete commentary you find difficult to answer.

I suppose we can hardly expect you to believe in the free exchange of views when you so clearly believe in confiscatory taxation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had a run-in with Herr Murphy he&#8217;s taken to removing things that discomfit him.  For the blog record:</p>
<p>&#8220;So, eventually you just give up and delete commentary you find difficult to answer.</p>
<p>I suppose we can hardly expect you to believe in the free exchange of views when you so clearly believe in confiscatory taxation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffH</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8266</guid>
		<description>I trust Morrisons’ shareholders are now calling their CFO and asking WTF is going on? He is clearly incomptenet if he is paying more tax than he needs to.

According to Murphy&#039;s Law that makes Morrisons and their accountants ethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust Morrisons’ shareholders are now calling their CFO and asking WTF is going on? He is clearly incomptenet if he is paying more tax than he needs to.</p>
<p>According to Murphy&#8217;s Law that makes Morrisons and their accountants ethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8250</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8250</guid>
		<description>Time to linkwhore my piece on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/02/29/on-tax-and-tesco/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why  this kind of thing really doesn&#039;t make any difference&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to linkwhore my piece on <a href="http://www.johnband.org/blog/2008/02/29/on-tax-and-tesco/" rel="nofollow">why  this kind of thing really doesn&#8217;t make any difference</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Simpleton</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Simpleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>&quot;Incidentally, humbler Morrisons pays proportionately much more tax than Tesco&quot;

I trust Morrisons&#039; shareholders are now calling their CFO and asking WTF is going on? He is clearly incomptenet if he is paying more tax than he needs  to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Incidentally, humbler Morrisons pays proportionately much more tax than Tesco&#8221;</p>
<p>I trust Morrisons&#8217; shareholders are now calling their CFO and asking WTF is going on? He is clearly incomptenet if he is paying more tax than he needs  to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Harford</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8220</link>
		<dc:creator>William Harford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8220</guid>
		<description>I knew she&#039;d weigh in on this eventually...

Like I said before, you&#039;d think that just one sub, editor, or legal would have thought, &quot;you know, maybe we should just have a tiny, little look at our own accounts before putting this to press...&quot;

Here&#039;s another fun statistic for you:

Tescos retained profit 2007: £1.9bn
Total director&#039;s pay: £19.6m
Dir&#039;s pay as % of profit - 1%

Guardian Group profit 2007: £64m
Total dir&#039;s pay: £5.4m
Dir&#039;s pay as % of profit: 8.4%

See - statistics are FUN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew she&#8217;d weigh in on this eventually&#8230;</p>
<p>Like I said before, you&#8217;d think that just one sub, editor, or legal would have thought, &#8220;you know, maybe we should just have a tiny, little look at our own accounts before putting this to press&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another fun statistic for you:</p>
<p>Tescos retained profit 2007: £1.9bn<br />
Total director&#8217;s pay: £19.6m<br />
Dir&#8217;s pay as % of profit &#8211; 1%</p>
<p>Guardian Group profit 2007: £64m<br />
Total dir&#8217;s pay: £5.4m<br />
Dir&#8217;s pay as % of profit: 8.4%</p>
<p>See &#8211; statistics are FUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth LLB BA ACCA ATII</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8213</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth LLB BA ACCA ATII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8213</guid>
		<description>If you pay money to the government, that is called &#039;tax&#039;. According to the Grauniad&#039;s world view, if you pay less than profits x 30% that&#039;s avoidance.

But there is such a thing as &#039;negative tax&#039;, call it subsidies, tax breaks, corporate welfare, whatever.

I wonder, how would the G&#039;s true tax bill look if you were to minus off all the hundreds of millions it gets for advertising these crappy state sector jobs? Probably negative. So they are the biggest tax avoiders of all, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you pay money to the government, that is called &#8216;tax&#8217;. According to the Grauniad&#8217;s world view, if you pay less than profits x 30% that&#8217;s avoidance.</p>
<p>But there is such a thing as &#8216;negative tax&#8217;, call it subsidies, tax breaks, corporate welfare, whatever.</p>
<p>I wonder, how would the G&#8217;s true tax bill look if you were to minus off all the hundreds of millions it gets for advertising these crappy state sector jobs? Probably negative. So they are the biggest tax avoiders of all, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/comment-page-1/#comment-8211</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/29/polly-on-tax-avoidance/#comment-8211</guid>
		<description>Really she shouldn&#039;t worry her dear little head about it.  Numbers aren&#039;t really the sort of mumsy thing that one can expect a girl to get right, are they?  Especially when she&#039;s a daft amd malevolent old bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really she shouldn&#8217;t worry her dear little head about it.  Numbers aren&#8217;t really the sort of mumsy thing that one can expect a girl to get right, are they?  Especially when she&#8217;s a daft amd malevolent old bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 295/299 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 09:23:52 -->
