<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polly on Gambling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/comment-page-1/#comment-7992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/#comment-7992</guid>
		<description>&quot;any other sector that is so heavily taxed&quot;!?

Tim, any sector that produces VAT-able supplies hands over just under 15% of its turnover as VAT. Sure, the nominal VAT bill is reduced by the input VAT they have paid to their own suppliers, but the total bill, VAT paid to HMRC plus input VAT paid to suppliers is 14.8936% of turnover.

Next question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;any other sector that is so heavily taxed&#8221;!?</p>
<p>Tim, any sector that produces VAT-able supplies hands over just under 15% of its turnover as VAT. Sure, the nominal VAT bill is reduced by the input VAT they have paid to their own suppliers, but the total bill, VAT paid to HMRC plus input VAT paid to suppliers is 14.8936% of turnover.</p>
<p>Next question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/comment-page-1/#comment-7985</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/#comment-7985</guid>
		<description>&quot;The usual things, I imagine. Facts. Economics. Logic.&quot;

Which is why it beggars belief that Mick Fealty of the Telegraph yesterday suggested that David Cameron listen to Polly for policy ideas.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/politics/brassneck/feb08/toriesforpolly.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The usual things, I imagine. Facts. Economics. Logic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is why it beggars belief that Mick Fealty of the Telegraph yesterday suggested that David Cameron listen to Polly for policy ideas.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/politics/brassneck/feb08/toriesforpolly.htm" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/politics/brassneck/feb08/toriesforpolly.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arfa</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/comment-page-1/#comment-7984</link>
		<dc:creator>Arfa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/polly-on-gambling/#comment-7984</guid>
		<description>&quot;What is it about gambling that makes Polly so confused?&quot;

The usual things, I imagine.  Facts.  Economics.  Logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What is it about gambling that makes Polly so confused?&#8221;</p>
<p>The usual things, I imagine.  Facts.  Economics.  Logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 192/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-24 06:44:09 -->
