<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvellous Plan!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-8031</guid>
		<description>&quot;Does it represent some deluxe mobile phone contract for every officer in the land.&quot;

Since they already have a bionic radio system being rolled out which can do SMS and voicecalls, no, I don&#039;t see that as the excuse. And you can&#039;t tell me that email costs that much. You could probably run an entire force&#039;s email off one Mac Leopard Server without an administrator.

Where do I bid for the £325m/year contract? I&#039;ll do it for half that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does it represent some deluxe mobile phone contract for every officer in the land.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since they already have a bionic radio system being rolled out which can do SMS and voicecalls, no, I don&#8217;t see that as the excuse. And you can&#8217;t tell me that email costs that much. You could probably run an entire force&#8217;s email off one Mac Leopard Server without an administrator.</p>
<p>Where do I bid for the £325m/year contract? I&#8217;ll do it for half that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Thomas</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-8029</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-8029</guid>
		<description>I quite like the idea of having a local bobbie and being able to call them.  However, I agree that the cost seems absurd.  Does it represent some deluxe mobile phone contract for every officer in the land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like the idea of having a local bobbie and being able to call them.  However, I agree that the cost seems absurd.  Does it represent some deluxe mobile phone contract for every officer in the land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>IT is indeed a call centre and the number is no different from the one that we&#039;ve had in Bath for some years; the &quot;out of hours&quot; service for non-emergencies is terrible (as, perhaps, it should be)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT is indeed a call centre and the number is no different from the one that we&#8217;ve had in Bath for some years; the &#8220;out of hours&#8221; service for non-emergencies is terrible (as, perhaps, it should be)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umbongo</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>Umbongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>&quot;Quite why this is going to cost £325m PER YEAR is beyond me.&quot;

Presumably there&#039;s going to be a national OfPolCall with regional and local OfPolCalls to follow - all with diversity and outreach officers  .  .  .  .  .  .  etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Quite why this is going to cost £325m PER YEAR is beyond me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Presumably there&#8217;s going to be a national OfPolCall with regional and local OfPolCalls to follow &#8211; all with diversity and outreach officers  .  .  .  .  .  .  etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-7981</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-7981</guid>
		<description>I think the plan is to be able to contact individual officers. You know, plod2355@sclerotic.police.gov.uk.

My local force already has email addresses, and they also all have mobile phones. Quite why this is going to cost £325m PER YEAR is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the plan is to be able to contact individual officers. You know, <a href="mailto:plod2355@sclerotic.police.gov.uk">plod2355@sclerotic.police.gov.uk</a>.</p>
<p>My local force already has email addresses, and they also all have mobile phones. Quite why this is going to cost £325m PER YEAR is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>Phoning local police officers (or local stations) sounds a big improvement to the situation now where I live. And not trusting 0845 numbers, I checked on some of the others in Avon and Somerset - looks like a call centre to me:


Avonmouth police station 	
0845 4567000 

Portishead police station 	
0845 4567000 

Minehead police station 	
0845 4567000 

Chipping Sodbury police station 	
0845 4567000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoning local police officers (or local stations) sounds a big improvement to the situation now where I live. And not trusting 0845 numbers, I checked on some of the others in Avon and Somerset &#8211; looks like a call centre to me:</p>
<p>Avonmouth police station<br />
0845 4567000 </p>
<p>Portishead police station<br />
0845 4567000 </p>
<p>Minehead police station<br />
0845 4567000 </p>
<p>Chipping Sodbury police station<br />
0845 4567000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-7978</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-7978</guid>
		<description>Email them to say what?  Help, someone is breaking into my house while I&#039;m surfing the internet?

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email them to say what?  Help, someone is breaking into my house while I&#8217;m surfing the internet?</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bennett</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>Is it suggested anywhere that the telephone will be manned, or that e-mails will be read by more than an auto-responder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it suggested anywhere that the telephone will be manned, or that e-mails will be read by more than an auto-responder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkC</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-7969</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/02/26/marvellous-plan/#comment-7969</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s Guvvermint.  Bloody lucky to get anything in place for less than half a billion.  Or should that be &quot;less than half an Old Bill&quot;? Let&#039;s see what kind of a mess they can make of a simple email protocol and application.

And how spookily appropriate that the Conservative&#039;s Home Affairs spokesman should be called &quot;Brokenshire&quot;.  I think that sums it up nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s Guvvermint.  Bloody lucky to get anything in place for less than half a billion.  Or should that be &#8220;less than half an Old Bill&#8221;? Let&#8217;s see what kind of a mess they can make of a simple email protocol and application.</p>
<p>And how spookily appropriate that the Conservative&#8217;s Home Affairs spokesman should be called &#8220;Brokenshire&#8221;.  I think that sums it up nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 281/283 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-24 06:38:01 -->
