<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ideas to Make Britain Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dai</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/comment-page-1/#comment-74229</link>
		<dc:creator>dai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/#comment-74229</guid>
		<description>I think most of the arguments I have seen on all subjects are pretty daft, too complicated and therfore costly or just plain un-intelligent.

With the riots/un-employment/oap prejudice and boredom (not inferm/elderly) poor pensions and youths, there are simple ways to solve some or all of these problems to a large extent.

Ex-military bases with lots of land or bought up land/maybe government owned land, there should be conversions and builds to create Forest Farm Camps.  These would have all single un-employed living alone for more than a year or year and a half without work being forced to live at a camp until employment is attained or they go without benefits including housing payments.
OAP&#039;S will be in seperated units of the land or a different camp if they volunteer to live and work there as they want to work and want to attain ease of life as their pensions are too small etc and live in a good community.
Youths would have six months to a years work experience at about 13 to 14 years of age whilst still having major class lessons at a camp unit and also having evening study time for other classes.

All things that are pleasant and useful will be provided such as internet access, phone lines and postage and paper for the un-employed who will be encouraged to apply for work anywhere through a government scheme housing them temporarily for suitable jobs only and then permanently when full-employment is attained.  Very limited benefits would be given such as £10 per week for extra&#039;s as all housing is paid for and food within reason.

All camps will have non-energy recreation rooms/pool table&#039;s/indoor sports and other simple games.
Slightly more for the OAP&#039;S for payment and activities/altered of course.  Crop targets will only apply to un-employed but the more you work the more you get as an OAP or un-employed person. (limited though)
Youths would also be given some incentives in some way?extra credit as have worked and can do a job etc(refference and performance report for employers). Or prizes.

Forest Farms create up-to three times as much food for the same amount of land so there will be plenty of work.

And if there is extra crops that are uneated by residents/tons per month most likely with all year round growing crop ranges etc they would be supplied to schools, police stations, NHS, fire service and military etc.
Reducing costs further. The camps would also have low carbon footprints and either solar roofs and/or a windmill generator. Reducing costs further.  Televisions are only for OAP&#039;S til a certain time and present in different viewing rooms/channel rooms that are agreed programming over the majority of camp stayers etc.
Lights out for working early etc.

Schools should also/and camps teach classes each week on morality, responsibilities/duties and relious history through films also/good films not the crap cheap ones etc.

This removes some un-employment, reduces the costs of subsidies to some pensions or un-employed rent costs.  It reduces youth (I should get what i want)attitude problems.
It reduces costs overall when looked at in this scale and also gives more people without any will some drive and force to meet their national responsibilities as well as makes some OAPS happier.

And more. Any opposition to the point.
Oh yeah and forcing un-employed to move make them want to get a job in the town they lived in/ even if they have to stick out another job for a while/but at least it reduces costs overall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of the arguments I have seen on all subjects are pretty daft, too complicated and therfore costly or just plain un-intelligent.</p>
<p>With the riots/un-employment/oap prejudice and boredom (not inferm/elderly) poor pensions and youths, there are simple ways to solve some or all of these problems to a large extent.</p>
<p>Ex-military bases with lots of land or bought up land/maybe government owned land, there should be conversions and builds to create Forest Farm Camps.  These would have all single un-employed living alone for more than a year or year and a half without work being forced to live at a camp until employment is attained or they go without benefits including housing payments.<br />
OAP&#8217;S will be in seperated units of the land or a different camp if they volunteer to live and work there as they want to work and want to attain ease of life as their pensions are too small etc and live in a good community.<br />
Youths would have six months to a years work experience at about 13 to 14 years of age whilst still having major class lessons at a camp unit and also having evening study time for other classes.</p>
<p>All things that are pleasant and useful will be provided such as internet access, phone lines and postage and paper for the un-employed who will be encouraged to apply for work anywhere through a government scheme housing them temporarily for suitable jobs only and then permanently when full-employment is attained.  Very limited benefits would be given such as £10 per week for extra&#8217;s as all housing is paid for and food within reason.</p>
<p>All camps will have non-energy recreation rooms/pool table&#8217;s/indoor sports and other simple games.<br />
Slightly more for the OAP&#8217;S for payment and activities/altered of course.  Crop targets will only apply to un-employed but the more you work the more you get as an OAP or un-employed person. (limited though)<br />
Youths would also be given some incentives in some way?extra credit as have worked and can do a job etc(refference and performance report for employers). Or prizes.</p>
<p>Forest Farms create up-to three times as much food for the same amount of land so there will be plenty of work.</p>
<p>And if there is extra crops that are uneated by residents/tons per month most likely with all year round growing crop ranges etc they would be supplied to schools, police stations, NHS, fire service and military etc.<br />
Reducing costs further. The camps would also have low carbon footprints and either solar roofs and/or a windmill generator. Reducing costs further.  Televisions are only for OAP&#8217;S til a certain time and present in different viewing rooms/channel rooms that are agreed programming over the majority of camp stayers etc.<br />
Lights out for working early etc.</p>
<p>Schools should also/and camps teach classes each week on morality, responsibilities/duties and relious history through films also/good films not the crap cheap ones etc.</p>
<p>This removes some un-employment, reduces the costs of subsidies to some pensions or un-employed rent costs.  It reduces youth (I should get what i want)attitude problems.<br />
It reduces costs overall when looked at in this scale and also gives more people without any will some drive and force to meet their national responsibilities as well as makes some OAPS happier.</p>
<p>And more. Any opposition to the point.<br />
Oh yeah and forcing un-employed to move make them want to get a job in the town they lived in/ even if they have to stick out another job for a while/but at least it reduces costs overall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bennett</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/comment-page-1/#comment-6161</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/#comment-6161</guid>
		<description>While my wife and I would both benefit personally from David Starkey&#039;s tax regime, his argument for it seems to be that all of us in that sector also receive tax credit. He is wrong. We are, by a very large margin, net contributors to the exchequer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While my wife and I would both benefit personally from David Starkey&#8217;s tax regime, his argument for it seems to be that all of us in that sector also receive tax credit. He is wrong. We are, by a very large margin, net contributors to the exchequer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/comment-page-1/#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>Woodhead is basically saying: &quot;I would like the State to subsidise my business&quot;, the story of producers everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodhead is basically saying: &#8220;I would like the State to subsidise my business&#8221;, the story of producers everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/comment-page-1/#comment-6139</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/#comment-6139</guid>
		<description>I spy the usual give-me-the-money   argument  for Pure Science research.  I also enjoyed the emptiness of  &quot;Keep it simple – diet,  .... good lifestyle and attendance for appropriate screening. &quot;   There&#039;s wisdom, boyo: diet, type unspecified; good lifestyle, nature unspecified; screening, &quot;appropriate&quot;.  Bloody brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spy the usual give-me-the-money   argument  for Pure Science research.  I also enjoyed the emptiness of  &#8220;Keep it simple – diet,  &#8230;. good lifestyle and attendance for appropriate screening. &#8221;   There&#8217;s wisdom, boyo: diet, type unspecified; good lifestyle, nature unspecified; screening, &#8220;appropriate&#8221;.  Bloody brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/comment-page-1/#comment-6136</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/27/top-ideas-to-make-britain-better/#comment-6136</guid>
		<description>Even a twat like Woodhead can say sensible things on topics he knows about.  What a sunny Sunday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a twat like Woodhead can say sensible things on topics he knows about.  What a sunny Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 238/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 11:55:20 -->
