Some of these are very good indeed.
Paul Ormerod economist
I would make more explicit the connection between tax and services received by abolishing the PAYE system. Instead of income tax being deducted by employers at source, I would make everyone sign a cheque to pay their tax. While it would increase administration in the first instance, it would bring home to people what they are paying for. When you physically hand money over, you inevitably question whether you are receiving value for money. This system would put political pressure on public services to ensure they deliver efficiently and would prevent the waste of public funds.
David Starkey historian
I would remove everyone earning less than £25,000 a year out of the tax system. At the moment we have a ridiculous circular system in which people are taxed, then given their money back in tax credits. It produces the idea of the state as provider – for something like one-third of the population. It imprisons people we should be liberating.
Chris Woodhead former chief inspector of schools
I would introduce an education voucher for parents with school-age children. The voucher would pay for a state education but could be cashed in at independent schools as payment or part-payment. It would help to make the rhetoric of parental choice a reality; would promote new providers of education in to the market and at a blow, would destroy the state monopoly which has created appallingly low standards which we see in so many schools today.
4 responses so far ↓
1 dearieme // Jan 27, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Even a twat like Woodhead can say sensible things on topics he knows about. What a sunny Sunday.
2 dearieme // Jan 27, 2008 at 2:56 pm
I spy the usual give-me-the-money argument for Pure Science research. I also enjoyed the emptiness of “Keep it simple – diet, …. good lifestyle and attendance for appropriate screening. ” There’s wisdom, boyo: diet, type unspecified; good lifestyle, nature unspecified; screening, “appropriate”. Bloody brilliant.
3 Matthew // Jan 27, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Woodhead is basically saying: “I would like the State to subsidise my business”, the story of producers everywhere.
4 Ian Bennett // Jan 28, 2008 at 9:43 am
While my wife and I would both benefit personally from David Starkey’s tax regime, his argument for it seems to be that all of us in that sector also receive tax credit. He is wrong. We are, by a very large margin, net contributors to the exchequer.
Leave a Comment