<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How We Know They&#8217;ve Got it Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/#comment-5843</guid>
		<description>The logic doesn&#039;t really work. It was going to be nationalised, now it&#039;s probably not. You would argue that a company in government hands is worth less than one owned by the private sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic doesn&#8217;t really work. It was going to be nationalised, now it&#8217;s probably not. You would argue that a company in government hands is worth less than one owned by the private sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mekon</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-5837</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mekon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/#comment-5837</guid>
		<description>Kay Tie - 

What about Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kay Tie &#8211; </p>
<p>What about Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bennett</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/#comment-5835</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first concern should be to net depositors.&quot;

Surely the first concern should be to the taxpayers whose money has been taken by force to prop up an ailing business. Then we can look to the depositors who at least had a choice as to where their cash would go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first concern should be to net depositors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely the first concern should be to the taxpayers whose money has been taken by force to prop up an ailing business. Then we can look to the depositors who at least had a choice as to where their cash would go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-5830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/#comment-5830</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first concern should be to net depositors. NR should be wound-up, to stop further risk. The accounts should be transferred to a solvent bank, etc. i.e. see the way NetBank was handled by the Fed.&quot;

A good system, but our Government has been asleep on the tiller and simply not reformed the banking laws to allow them to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first concern should be to net depositors. NR should be wound-up, to stop further risk. The accounts should be transferred to a solvent bank, etc. i.e. see the way NetBank was handled by the Fed.&#8221;</p>
<p>A good system, but our Government has been asleep on the tiller and simply not reformed the banking laws to allow them to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiCitizenOne</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-5824</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiCitizenOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2008/01/21/how-we-know-theyve-got-it-wrong/#comment-5824</guid>
		<description>The amount going to shareholders should be an cardinal integer less than one.

The first concern should be to net depositors. NR should be wound-up, to stop further risk. The accounts should be transferred to a solvent bank, etc. i.e. see the way NetBank was handled by the Fed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount going to shareholders should be an cardinal integer less than one.</p>
<p>The first concern should be to net depositors. NR should be wound-up, to stop further risk. The accounts should be transferred to a solvent bank, etc. i.e. see the way NetBank was handled by the Fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 238/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 11:52:54 -->
