Zoe Margolis goes to the Erotica Show:
And yet, everywhere one looked there were women. One could hardly avoid the tits and arses on display: on almost every stall were women dressed in little more than underwear, handing out leaflets, T-shirts or DVDs. But it was not the flesh on display that I found objectionable: it was the disproportionate amount of female nudity.
I’m straight. I like to have sex with men. I enjoy looking at naked men. I don’t think I am that unusual in my tastes, but at Erotica - as with the rest of the sex industry - I found myself feeling at odds with what was on offer.
"Where are all the men?" I found myself muttering as yet another young woman gyrated her hips and jiggled her breasts as she stood on a boat (promoting a porn site - of course). "Why are there no hot men doing the same?" The only men I could see were either paying visitors, or working alongside the half-naked women - but fully dressed. So I went in search of male nudity. I sought it out in the hope that perhaps, for once, as a consumer, I might be treated equally.
Does anyone else think that she’s becoming rather a one trick* pony? Getting into something of a rut**?
* Well, for a given meaning of trick, obviously.
** Bad pun, sorry.
3 responses so far ↓
1 sandyrham // Nov 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm
Soppy trout!
Until women start paying men for sex there won’t be a nude male industry.
You want nude men, dear, pay for it!
:D:D
2 knirirr // Nov 29, 2007 at 1:52 pm
I was under the impression that many gay men were happy to pay men for sex. Why weren’t there scantily clad male models present for that reason?
3 Ms Robinson // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:27 am
Not ‘becoming’ Timmy. But is. IF she could think AND IF she could construct an argument it might just work…but that aint gonna happen.
She borrows feminism like a fucking clip on mobile phone cover to justify the weakest of concepts.
As I said on her eloquent post, the market gets what the market wants.
Leave a Comment