<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Shags Have You Had Miss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaib</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>Richard dr is correct, it seems however when pressed in Committee the Commission official accepted that the question should not have been there as it was intrusive. 

The problem is when pc speak is put before the public, as it would be in the event of these questions being asked they will not be understood. If they desire to be understood by the public they must be comprehensible to them. At its best the question still asks when was your first live in lover.

Rather splendidly from a pointy-headed statistition perspective it makes sense to only ask women, as men are regarded as feckless, skipping from bedroom to bedroom as the fancy suits them. 

FYI. The questions were thrown out in the Committee vote today and because of the actions of the UKIP MEP we have a statement from the Commission on record stating that they will not be reintroduced at a later date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard dr is correct, it seems however when pressed in Committee the Commission official accepted that the question should not have been there as it was intrusive. </p>
<p>The problem is when pc speak is put before the public, as it would be in the event of these questions being asked they will not be understood. If they desire to be understood by the public they must be comprehensible to them. At its best the question still asks when was your first live in lover.</p>
<p>Rather splendidly from a pointy-headed statistition perspective it makes sense to only ask women, as men are regarded as feckless, skipping from bedroom to bedroom as the fancy suits them. </p>
<p>FYI. The questions were thrown out in the Committee vote today and because of the actions of the UKIP MEP we have a statement from the Commission on record stating that they will not be reintroduced at a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2835</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2835</guid>
		<description>&quot;How do you know, anyway?&quot;

Because the proposals have been out for &quot;consultation&quot;. They are running tests on the proposed census right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How do you know, anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the proposals have been out for &#8220;consultation&#8221;. They are running tests on the proposed census right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>Whatever &#039;consensual union&#039; specifically means, I&#039;m kind of baffled as to what it&#039;s got to do with these people anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever &#8216;consensual union&#8217; specifically means, I&#8217;m kind of baffled as to what it&#8217;s got to do with these people anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richardr</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>Richardr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>It is a misunderstanding of what &quot;consensual union&quot; means - which is a PC way of asking when the household got together.

The question is voluntary for each government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a misunderstanding of what &#8220;consensual union&#8221; means &#8211; which is a PC way of asking when the household got together.</p>
<p>The question is voluntary for each government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Black Sambo</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Black Sambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>&quot;Less worse&quot;??
How do you know, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Less worse&#8221;??<br />
How do you know, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Tie</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/11/21/how-many-shags-have-you-had-miss/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a lot less worse that our census is going to be. But in any case, since I lie (I put down &quot;Asian&quot; when I&#039;m completely white, on the basis that ethnicity is now deemed to be self-defined anyway) where I can&#039;t be disproved, I don&#039;t care what questions they ask - they aren&#039;t getting anything they don&#039;t already know anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a lot less worse that our census is going to be. But in any case, since I lie (I put down &#8220;Asian&#8221; when I&#8217;m completely white, on the basis that ethnicity is now deemed to be self-defined anyway) where I can&#8217;t be disproved, I don&#8217;t care what questions they ask &#8211; they aren&#8217;t getting anything they don&#8217;t already know anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 236/237 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-23 13:45:40 -->
