<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water Trading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Winfield</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Winfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall many years ago some wild schemes to supply water to the Middle East by towing giant icebergs, mooring them offshore and pumping off the wwater as it melted. Then someone else topped that by the simple expedient of filling supertankers with North American water and sending them to the Gulf when they would normally go in ballast. A return load for a supertanker - can&#039;t be bad? Never heard what came of it - maybe desalination with the cheap gas they have was better  all round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall many years ago some wild schemes to supply water to the Middle East by towing giant icebergs, mooring them offshore and pumping off the wwater as it melted. Then someone else topped that by the simple expedient of filling supertankers with North American water and sending them to the Gulf when they would normally go in ballast. A return load for a supertanker &#8211; can&#8217;t be bad? Never heard what came of it &#8211; maybe desalination with the cheap gas they have was better  all round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Tim, you seem to be having a conversation with yourself about imaginary protests. 

Water futures is an interesting one. Can you store it and deliver it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, you seem to be having a conversation with yourself about imaginary protests. </p>
<p>Water futures is an interesting one. Can you store it and deliver it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanCroydon</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>IanCroydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>But ... but ... desalinization is a CO2 emitter !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8230; but &#8230; desalinization is a CO2 emitter !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Thomas</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/10/19/water-trading/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>The whole water issue is massively overhyped.  Bjorn Lomburg in &quot;The Skeptical Environmentalist&quot; makes clear that it is only groundwater that is running short, that we exploit the merest fraction of rainfall and that even the hawks of arid Israeli admit that desalinisation plants are a lot cheaper than a war over water.  

Life just isn&#039;t any fun for ecofascists unless we&#039;re running out of everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole water issue is massively overhyped.  Bjorn Lomburg in &#8220;The Skeptical Environmentalist&#8221; makes clear that it is only groundwater that is running short, that we exploit the merest fraction of rainfall and that even the hawks of arid Israeli admit that desalinisation plants are a lot cheaper than a war over water.  </p>
<p>Life just isn&#8217;t any fun for ecofascists unless we&#8217;re running out of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 219/223 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-02-12 01:16:38 -->
