<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amanda Marcottism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>It is all obvious or trivial except...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Mark, you know that drugs *were* pretty much all legal in Victorian times, right?

Tim adds: I&#039;ve seen somewhere that the average annual consumption of opium in the UK in the 1870s/80s was 260 or so doses per capita (man , woman and child): usually in the form of laudanum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you know that drugs *were* pretty much all legal in Victorian times, right?</p>
<p>Tim adds: I&#8217;ve seen somewhere that the average annual consumption of opium in the UK in the 1870s/80s was 260 or so doses per capita (man , woman and child): usually in the form of laudanum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I like it. 

Amanda accuses him (for no particular reason) of wanting to return to Victorian Values. 

Hmm.

So I then follow the link to Eric and he starts off by saying he&#039;d happily legalise all drugs, which were all legal in Victorian times of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. </p>
<p>Amanda accuses him (for no particular reason) of wanting to return to Victorian Values. </p>
<p>Hmm.</p>
<p>So I then follow the link to Eric and he starts off by saying he&#8217;d happily legalise all drugs, which were all legal in Victorian times of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Phew!  Wish I had a brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew!  Wish I had a brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Ronin</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Ronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Amanda&#039;s apparently tenuous grip on reality has yet to prevent one of her infamously convoluted diatribes, so it comes as no great surprise that she would ignore the obvious question. It would only detract from her preplanned screed of the day. Fomenting outrage is her schtick. 

Kudos on your new digs, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda&#8217;s apparently tenuous grip on reality has yet to prevent one of her infamously convoluted diatribes, so it comes as no great surprise that she would ignore the obvious question. It would only detract from her preplanned screed of the day. Fomenting outrage is her schtick. </p>
<p>Kudos on your new digs, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Black Sambo</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Black Sambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t understand a word of all that. It appears to be in code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t understand a word of all that. It appears to be in code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m misunderstanding something here - are you really praising this appalling harpie, Tim?  She is everything which is wrong with blogging - gutter blogging.

The commenter above uses choice language too but he has a brain.

Tim adds: No James, I&#039;m making fun of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m misunderstanding something here &#8211; are you really praising this appalling harpie, Tim?  She is everything which is wrong with blogging &#8211; gutter blogging.</p>
<p>The commenter above uses choice language too but he has a brain.</p>
<p>Tim adds: No James, I&#8217;m making fun of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Eugenides</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Eugenides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s some good work there. I see, from the subsequent comment, that the lefties even have an unpleasant gay equivalent for the phrase &quot;Uncle Tom&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some good work there. I see, from the subsequent comment, that the lefties even have an unpleasant gay equivalent for the phrase &#8220;Uncle Tom&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timworstall.com/2007/09/23/amanda-marcottism-of-the-day/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>It was a happier world when I believed that Amanda Marcotte was a flavour of ice cream.  Curse you, Worstall, for disillusioning me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a happier world when I believed that Amanda Marcotte was a flavour of ice cream.  Curse you, Worstall, for disillusioning me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 267/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: timworstall.com @ 2012-05-22 22:24:14 -->
